Honestly it’s kinda just a miss or hit with indirect democracy but how I see it I think it’s good because there’s an elected official that represents the majority of the peoples voices these officials represent the citizens' ideas and concerns in government
Answer:
A. both Jonathan's and Joanna's cases
Explanation:
Legal implication: The term "legal implication" is described as a phenomenon that is considered as the consequences or results in which an individual in being involved something inappropriate according to the specific law. Legal implications can either be negative or positive.
Ethical implication: The term "ethical implication" is described as a phenomenon in which various matter is being considered based on an ethical viewpoint. It is considered as the human principle based on wrong and right.
In the question above, the correct answer is A.
Answer: the correct answer is (c) a fallacious argument masquerading as valid.
Explanation:
Fallacious Argument.- An argument that sometimes fools human reasoning, but is not logically valid. It is crucial to remember that reasoning from definitions and facts to conclusions is fundamentally different from reasoning about definitions.
Answer:
It was an important military strategy to control the Hudson river.
Explanation:
British Army wanted to divide rest of the states from New England. It would isolate New England this way.
New England was the center of the rebellion. Three British armies marched from "New York City, Montreal and Fort Oswego" and met in Albany. Then they seized Hudson River. It formed a natural obstruction along the western side of New England. The British were then able to move South and defeat the Southern colonies.
Thus, it was a very important and good military strategy.
Answer:
Sufism
Explanation:
A philosophy developed by Arab scholars was the belief that God’s love can be found through a personal relationship with God is called sufism.
