Answer:
Then some of the ladies began to say that it was a disgrace to the town and a bad example
He would never divulge what happened during that interview, but he refused to go back again.
Explanation:
We can infer from Evidence 1 that they are talking about Emily as later on in the text, it mentions Emily. Therefore, this is an indirect statement saying that Emily is a disgrace to the town due to her tough behaviour.
Evidence 2 shows that the Baptist saw something bad as he refuses to go back due to the horror he's seen. Therefore, both statements are inferral based but we can kind of guess from the rest of the text.
Sorry, I'm not sure this makes much sense. It did in my head at least.
The answer is C,
Use precise, sensory language. :)
I think is climax probably
Answer:
A. The bias is negative because it is speaking negatively about reading.
B. "waste of time.", "They don't really lean anything that is useful about how to deal with everyday problems.", "boring".
Explanation:
Hope this helped!! :3
Answer:
Anne's diary survived through Miep Gies, she was one of the people that helped everyone hidden in the secret annex, and kept Anne's writings safe in a drawer. Not only the diary, but also the revisions. Miep gave the diary to Otto, (Annes father) Otto was fascinated with all of Anne's writings so he had the diary typed up, and looked for a publisher. Eventually one of Ottos friends showed the diary to a historian, who ended up writing a front page article on it. This gained much attention, and thus, Anne Franks diary was soon published!
Hope I helped<3
