Answer:
Congress was concerned about how admitting it as a slave state would affect representation and the balance of power between states.
Explanation:
During that period, Missouri was a huge area that was called Missouri Territory and by 1819, there were enough people in part of that so it could be considered a state. But to be considered a state the Congress had to approve it.
In that period there was a struggle between free states and pro-slavery states the union wanted a balance between those two and the addition of a new state could ruin that balance.
The admission of Missouri would have added a slave state to the Senate and left northern non-slave states as a minority. This is the reason the application of Missouri caused a two-year debate.
Answer:
Tunneling nanotubes.
Explanation:
Tunneling nanotubes refer to certain very thin and elongated tubules that emerge from the membrane of a cell and allows it to connect and communicate with other neighboring cells over relatively long distances. Because of their very small size, tunneling nanotubes were only discovered until 1999, and their role in cell communication is still not fully understood. It is known that they're capable of transmitting and conducting cell-surface proteins, cytoplasmic vesicles and calcium signals between cells. However, they can also act as vectors for viruses such as HIV.
Answer:
c. Forensic Psychologist would be the best answer
Explanation:
A forensic psychologist/criminal psychologist's job involves both a good understanding of psychology and the law.
Answer: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels
Explanation: Together with Engels, Marx developed a theory that became the basis of what would be called communism. In fact, it is the so-called Marxist theory, or else known as Marxism. Certainly all these names refer to the idea of communism, according to which the law is nothing more than a set of rules established by the ruling class to maintain that rule. These laws are so designed and interpreted that they allow the ruling class to do whatever they want, and the key thing is to exploit the working class to profit from it. On the other hand, the working class, by the same laws but by the opposite interpretation of those rules, was denied many rights and so incensed that it could be more easily exploited. On the other hand, the working class was denied many rights under the same laws, but by the opposite interpretation of these rules, which made the working class oppressed so that it would be easier to exploit them. This is how these creators of the Marxist idea claim.
