Explanation:
While technology, population, environment factors, and racial inequality can prompt social change, only when members of a society organize into social movements does true social change occur. The phrase social movements refers to collective activities designed to bring about or resist primary changes in an existing society or group.
Wherever they occur, social movements can dramatically shape the direction of society. When individuals and groups of people—civil rights activists and other visionaries, for instance—transcend traditional bounds, they may bring about major shifts in social policy and structures. Even when they prove initially unsuccessful, social movements do affect public opinion. In her day, people considered Margaret Sanger's efforts to make birth control available extreme and even immoral, yet today in the United States, one can easily purchase contraceptive products.
Social scientists interest themselves in why social movements emerge. Do feelings of discontent, desires for a “change of pace,” or even yearnings for “change for the sake of change” cause these shifts? Sociologists use two theories to explain why people mobilize for change: relative deprivation and resource mobilization.
Answer: Washington, during his tenure, wanted to avoid conflict with the British or the French at all costs.
Explanation:
The issue of the French Revolution is undoubtedly the most significant factor in Washington's foreign policy. The question arose as to how America should be positioned accordingly. The Federalists tilted the British as they feared radicalism since the revolution.
Republicans have taken the position that France should be supported because it helped them in the war with Britain. Washington was neutral. He, therefore, referred to "a different course" in his statement because he felt that the united states were too weak for another major conflict. In line with his views, he issued a declaration of neutrality in 1973, stating that the United States is at peace with Britain and France.
Answer:
Reserved powers
Federalism describes the system of shared governance between national ... both exclusive and concurrent powers, which help to explain the negotiation ... the Constitution envisioned that state governments, not the national government, ... Exclusive powers are those powers reserved to the federal government or the states.
<span> according to pleck, Pablo is experiencing: Roles strain
Roles strain refers to the stress that caused by not being able to feel someone's expectation to fulfill a certain role.
In this case, the stress come from the different pressure from both his wife who expect Pablo to fulfill the role as a sensitive person and society who expect Pablo to fulfill the role as the provider.</span>
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
