Answer:
Pros of Mandatory Voting
Mandatory Voting Would Increase Voter Turnout
Compulsory Voting Would Change Campaigning for the Better
Compulsory Voting Would Encourage Engagement in the Political Process
Compulsory Voting Would Discourage Voter Suppression
Cons of Mandatory Voting
Compulsory Voting Would Encourage an Uninformed Electorate
Compulsory Voting Would Hamper Freedom of Choice
It would be a burden to law enforcement
Compulsory Voting Could Infringe on Religious Rights
Explanation:
Mandatory voting requires some countries with eligible citizens to register and vote in elections. In the United States, voting is not mandatory; it is a freedom that citizens of the US have stated in the Constitution.
Answer: Reliance on legal precedent
Explanation:
Reliance on legal precedent should be a key factor in court's ruling since if stakeholders cant's success on mediating their reliance on precedent forfeit, then any claim they'do therefore, it'll be taken under stare decisis doctrine. This comes from a judicial theory that states: when a pronouncement has built enough reliance, then a presumption against adjudicative change must follow.
One way in which Americans developed a unique cultural identity after the Revolution was by ratifying the Constitution, which created a true "nation" as opposed to a lose confederation of states, which allowed people to develop a sense of nationalism and "pride" in their country.
All the material has to be direct bearing or can be an assistance in the constructing the history of a particular period are called as historical facts or sources <span />