I guess the correct answer is Scientific Law.
Scientific Law is rule of nature that tells you what will happen under certain conditions.
Answer:
Monthly pay= 5344.67
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
To live comfortably, you decide you will need to save $ 1million by the time you are 65.
Today is your 29th birthday, and you decide to put the same amount into a savings account. If the interest rate is 8%.
How much must you set aside each year?
n= 36
i= 0.08
FV= 1,000,000
We need to use the following formula:
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
We need to isolate A (monthly pay):
<u>A= (FV*i)/[(1+i)^n-1]</u>
A= (1000000*0.08)/(1.08^36-1)
A= 80000/14.96817184
A= 5344.67
Answer:
Trading.
Explanation:
In Business management, when a gain or loss is realized, it simply means that the owner of stock or other securities has sold it. Thus, these unrealized gains or losses are generally referred to as paper profits or losses.
Basically, when the value of a stock being bought by an investor reduces (falls) while he or she is yet to sell it, it is known as an unrealized loss.
However, when the value of a stock being bought by an investor rises (increases) while he or she is yet to sell it, it is known as an unrealized gains.
Hence, unrealized holding gains or losses which are recognized in income are from debt securities classified as trading.
Answer:
The answer is D, the reporter is liable for a claim of libel
Explanation:
First of, we need to understand that libel in it self refers to a false statement or report published against an individual and of which the report has a very high tendency of tarnishing the individuals image. In order words, it can also be refereed to as the defamation of character where the victim in this case is refereed to as the character.
So, referring back to the question. As a reporter, it is assumed that proper diligence has been done in respect to investigation or investigative journalism as some like to call it before going before the public to declare such a defaming statement and in such a case where such sequentially, the statement comes to be a false statement, the reporter and in some cases the firm at large is liable for a claim of libel.
So as related to the question asked, the answer is D.
Answer:Umm fade out is the opposite if fade in, but it might not be correct.
Explanation:
;)