Answer:
The double-exempt bond is the preferred investment because it has a higher after-tax return Tax benefit .
Explanation:
Calculatation of the after-tax return on both bonds
1)The double-exempt bond does not pay state or federal income taxes.
After-tax return =
Before-tax return = 4.9%
2)The tax-exempt bond is the state income taxes, but not federal in which the states can decide whether to tax their bonds or not.
Interest Income (100,000 * 5%) 5,000
Less: State taxes at 10% (5,000* 10%) (500)
Tax benefit from deduction of state taxes on federal return (500 * 35%) 175
After-tax Income 4,675
After-tax return = 4,675/100,000 = 4.675%
Therefore the double-exempt bond is the preferred investment because it has a higher after-tax return Tax benefit .
Hence the state income tax will be deductible on Juan’s federal tax return and Juan’s federal taxable income will be lower or lesser by $500 which will produces tax savings at his federal marginal tax rate of $500 * 35% = $175.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Contribution Margin for Bat
= $50 - $50
= $0
Contribution Margin for Gloves = $100 - $80
= $20
Now
Overall Contribution Margin = (0 ×70%) + ($20 × 30%)
= $0 + $6
= $6
Now
A. Break even sales = Fixed cost ÷ contribution margin
= $57,000 ÷ $6
= 9,500
B.Baseball bats = 9,500 × 70% =6,650
Baseball Gloves = 9,500 × 30% = 2,850
Answer:
the answer is option D)<u>Equal sharing of the bill ensures that people order a similar dollar amount of food</u>
Explanation:
The theory of consumer behavior states that "consumers allocate incomes among different goods and services to maximize their utility"
Consumer behavior revolves around three parameters their preferences, budget constraints, and options available.
The budget constraint will definitely influence the choice of what to buy within the options available to maximize utility. That means how the bill is shared among the three friends will ultimately affect how much they will chose to eat.
Secondly, The vegetarian will not be better off with equal sharing of the bill because the cost of his food according to the data provided is less.
We don not know for sure if the wine drinker drinks too much or whether he will want his other friends to foot the extra bill from the cost of his wine but we are certain that equal sharing of the bill ensures that people order a similar dollar amount of food.
Leadership is showing the way to people and making people better.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The conservative approach is that the firm has greater level of working capital investment than the competitor or industry average. So to fund the higher level of working capital the company has a set of policy and targets related to the level of debt level which means the company will not be willing to borrow further money if their borrowing exceeds the set limit or benchmark. They might use the equity instruments (Preferred stock or Common equity) to fund the higher level of working capital.
So their no absolute argument whether the denominator will increase or the nominator will increase in the Total debt to capital ratio. Hence the statement is false.
