Answer:
(C) Joss should charge Iris $500 and Daphne $800, that way economic surplus is maximized.
Explanation:
Assuming information asymmetries in the market, and Iris and Daphne are incapable of compare their willingness to pay against the average price of the market for this type of service, C is true since Joss maximize the economic surplus by increasing his productivity using the time better than his opportunity cost.
Answer:
Gross Profit 714,000
Explanation:
Gross Proft: is the diference between the sales revenue and the cost of the goods sold.
Sales revenue 1,254,000
Cost of Goods Sold (540,000)
Gross Profit 714,000
note: All the other account and values are irrelevant to determinate the gross profit.
<u>Other way to calculate gross profit:</u>
(sale price per unit - cost per unit) x unit sold
Answer:
The correct answer is predictive validity test.
Explanation:
A predictive validity test is carried out in order to predict the performance that a collaborator will have in the future. With this dynamic, it is ensured that an honest employee is hired, and that he always acts under the rules of the organization to which he will belong. In general, there are discrepancies compared to what many people can do under certain circumstances, and this test is precisely what they want to know about the performance under different scenarios.
Answer:
Financial planning is a step-by-step approach to meet one's life goals. A financial plan acts as a guide as you go through life's journey. Essentially, it helps you be in control of your income, expenses and investments such that you can manage your money and achieve your goals.
Explanation:
Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.