3 years ago

The Boston tea party was NOT justified because ?

2 answers:

5 0

A final point to argue that it was not justified is that the Tea Act of 1773 was essentially a win for the colonies already.

algol [13]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The boston tea party was not because it was a win already

You might be interested in

How did governments try to regulate business in the 1800s, and why were their efforts largely unsuccessful?

Whitepunk [10]

Answer:The national government began regulating business in the late 1800s in order to eliminate monopolies, businesses or groups that have exclusive control of an industry. Government now regulates a wide array of business practices, including the elimination of competition and fraudulent product offerings. Regulating labor.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

The major reason why people use credit is because they

erastova [34]

Answer:I think it's all of the above.

Explanation:Whether you like my view or not but if you respect other people's view plz don't forget to thank me my friend...

6 0

3 years ago

The quote below was written in the early 21st century: Every American, regardless of their background, has the right to live fre

Blizzard [7]

Most citizens maintain that individual rights and freedoms should be protected even when fighting against the world's terrorists.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE HELP I GIVE BRAINLIEST

OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

Reduce the power of pope

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

What antitrust law, enacted by congress in 1914, gave the federal gov't greater powers to "bust" trusts?

Anastaziya [24]

<span>The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 gave the federal government more power to dismantle trusts which were dangerous to the free market. Trusts created market monopolies and drove prices of goods higher than people could afford. This act was preceded by the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890.</span>

3 0

3 years ago