C the number of jeans the stock is reduced by from each sale
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1) The given inequality is
Arranging the terms with p² and p, we get
Hence, the inequality is of the form
Ap² + Bp + c < 0
2. A quadratic equation of the form
Ap² + Bp + c < 0 with A > 0 looks like
<u>Check the attached image</u>
The region where the values are negative lies between p₁ and p₂ ...
The p₁ < p < p₂
Answer:
$10.12
Step-by-step explanation:
Step one:
given data
we are told that the cost of binoculars is $155.75
and also the sales tax is 7%
Step two:
We want to first solve for the sales tax which is 7% of $155.75
=7/100* 155.75
=0.070*155.75
=10.12
Cassie will pay a tax of $10.12
Also Cassie will pay a total amount of
= 155.75+10.12
=$165.87
As an expression, this is:
222c - 15 = c
If you want to solve it, add 15 to each side to get:
222c = c + 15
Subtract c from each side:
221c = 15
Divide each side by 221:
c ≈ 0.0678733
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In the model
Log (salary) = B0 + B1LSAT +B2GPA +B3log(libvol) +B4log(cost)+B5 rank+u
The hypothesis that rank has no effect on log (salary) is H0:B5 = 0. The estimated equation (now with standard errors) is
Log (salary) = 8.34 + .0047 LSAT + .248 GPA + .095 log(libvol)
(0.53) (.0040) (.090) (.033)
+ .038 log(cost) – .0033 rank
(.032) (.0003)
n = 136, R2 = .842.
The t statistic on rank is –11(i.e. 0.0033/0.0003), which is very significant. If rank decreases by 10 (which is a move up for a law school), median starting salary is predicted to increase by about 3.3%.
(ii) LSAT is not statistically significant (t statistic ≈1.18) but GPA is very significance (t statistic ≈2.76). The test for joint significance is moot given that GPA is so significant, but for completeness the F statistic is about 9.95 (with 2 and 130 df) and p-value ≈.0001.