1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Triss [41]
2 years ago
12

. . . [A] great portion of that time which ought to have been devoted calmly and impartially to consider what alterations in our

federal government would be most likely to procure and preserve the happiness of the Union was employed in a violent struggle on the one side to obtain all power and dominion in their own hands, and on the other to prevent it; and that the aggrandizement of particular states, and particular individuals, appears to have been much more the subject sought after than the welfare of our country . . . .
When I took my seat in the Convention, I found them attempting to bring forward a system which, I was sure, never had entered into the contemplation of those I had the honor to represent, and which, upon the fullest consideration, I considered not only injurious to the interest and rights of this state but also incompatible with the political happiness and freedom of the states in general. From that time until my business compelled me to leave the Convention, I gave it every possible opposition, in every stage of its progression. I opposed the system there with the same explicit frankness with which I have here given you a history of our proceedings, an account of my own conduct, which in a particular manner I consider you as having a right to know. While there, I endeavored to act as became a free man and the delegate of a free state. Should my conduct obtain the approbation [act of approval] of those who appointed me, I will not deny it would afford me satisfaction; but to me that approbation was at most no more than a secondary consideration—my first was to deserve it. Left to myself to act according to the best of my discretion, my conduct should have been the same had I been even sure your censure would have been my only reward, since I hold it sacredly my duty to dash the cup of poison, if possible, from the hand of a state or an individual, however anxious the one or the other might be to swallow it . . . .

THE QUESTION: Why, according to Luther Martin, did he walk out of the Constitutional Convention?
Social Studies
2 answers:
borishaifa [10]2 years ago
7 0
He was an anti federal list .
ivanzaharov [21]2 years ago
6 0
He was anti Federalist and opposed to the plan for a strong central government, Martin displayed his disapproval of what the Convention produced by walking out without signing the Constitution.
You might be interested in
How do you report an account or a stolen card
pickupchik [31]

If your card is lost or stolen, you can always report it online from Wells Fargo or any website that your card is from.

When you report your credit card as lost or stolen, you will receive a new card with a new account number.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1829, the ________ gained power in Mexico and began to pass new laws that were unpopular in Texas. *
Ivahew [28]

Answer:

D.) Spanish

In 1829, the Spanish gained power in Mexico and began to pass new laws that were unpopular in Texas. *

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Look at the diagram about Incan civilization. Which statement identifies a major effect of the causes shown in the diagram? pls
Pepsi [2]

Answer:

B. Unification of the empire

Explanation:

I would pick B. because, in order to have an empire, you need all three of those. D makes no sense because you can't really put those two together. A doesn't really connect either. The only relation is that they have a powerful army.

Hope I helped :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
filipino A.mula sa ibinigay na salita sa ibaba ibigay ang kahulugan ng mga salita batay sa kayarian ng salitang kinabibilangan.
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

??

Explanation:

??

7 0
2 years ago
What is the “preclearance” requirement described in section 5 ?
zzz [600]

Answer:

A core special provision is the Section 5 preclearance requirement, which prohibits certain jurisdictions from implementing any change affecting voting without receiving preapproval from the U.S. Attorney General or the U.S. District Court for D.C. that the change does not discriminate against protected minorities.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to kant, what can be known about the noumenal reality?
    15·1 answer
  • Your friend hopes to expand her business to multiple locations. It would be best for her to create a
    10·1 answer
  • Educational professionals sought to reform schools by:
    6·1 answer
  • What type of research is designed specifically to test some developmental explanation and expand scientific knowledge?
    7·1 answer
  • Henry David Thoreau felt that war was unjust and therefore refused to pay his taxes when the United States declared war on Mexic
    12·2 answers
  • A student listens to an editorial response on the TV news in which the speaker charges that a city politician is acting like Mac
    10·1 answer
  • Loss-to-follow-up can be a problem in observational studies but not experimental ones.
    14·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    8·2 answers
  • We should value the elders in our society and learn from their wisdom
    9·1 answer
  • in what type of unethical behavior does a leader use harsh criticism, name-calling, gossip, slander, personal attacks, or threat
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!