The answer would be tertial consumers
Three ways that humans have cut and frayed the woven tapestry of earths
biodiversity:
1.
Landscaping.
By landscaping, living things such as trees are eliminated to make way for the
construction of buildings. And thus, disrupting the ecosystem.
2.
Adding cement
to the ocean to increase the land surface area by excavating soil from the
maintains.
3.
Cutting of
trees.
A hypothesis is an educated guess. This is part of the scientific method developed in science to explain natural phenomena in the environment. Usually scientists use the hypothesis in their controlled experiments.
Whether it is a fact or not scientists use the hypothesis as a basis or a starting point for further explanations. This is known as the scientific hypothesis. When an educated guess yields the same results over time, the answer is called a theory. Something that is widely accepted but still needs to be proven and investigated further.
I believe B) I think because if there are more animals nothing is going to change but the supplys like food and shelter may decrease but that's not an option
Both parents must be carriers, which means they have the heterozygous gene (one uppercase letter & one lower case letter). They will still carry that mutated gene (because they have a lower case letter), and their offspring will have a 25% chance of getting a recessive disorder. The percentage is low but still possible.
