Answer:
NPV = 138,347.55
Explanation:
<em>Net Present Value (NPV) : This is one of the techniques available to evaluate the feasibility of an investment project. The NPV of a project is the difference between the present value of the cash inflows and the cash outflows of the project.</em>
We sahall compute theNPV of this project by discounting the appropriate cash flows as follows:
<em>Prevent Value of operating cash flow</em>
PV =A× (1- (1+r)^(-n))/r
A- 23,900, r - 12%, n- 5
PV = $23,900 × (1- (1.12)^(-5))/0.05
=206,769.963
<em>PV of Working Capital recouped</em>
PV = 5600× 1.12^(-5)
= 3,177.59
NPV = initial cost + working capital + Present Value of working capital recouped + PV of operating cash inflow
NPV = (66,000) + (5600) + 3,177.59 + 206,769.96
NPV = 138,347.55
Answer:
a. $1,765,000
Explanation:
Total stockholder’s equity on December 31, 2013 = Total equity at end 2012 – amount paid for 3,000 shares were reacquired at $28 per share – amount paid for 3,000 shares were reacquired at $35 per share + amount collect from 1,800 shares of treasury stock were sold at $30 per share + net income of $450,000
= $1,450,000 – 3,000 * $28 – 3,000 * $35 + 1,8000 *$30 + $450,000 = $1,765,000
Answer
Net income 177,200
+35230 depreciation
+4,920 loss on disposal
217,350 adjusted net income (a)
↑↓
↑AR -14,160
↑Prepaid -4,190
↑AP 17,220
Change in working Capital -1,130(b)
<u />
<u>Cash Flow generated from operating activities 216,220</u>
<u />
Explanation:
(a) we must remove the non-monetary account from the income statement
This means add the non-monetary expenses and losses
Subtract the non monetary revenue and gains
(b)
The increase in assets account have a negative meaning, because it is assumed the company used cash to adquire it.
Whiel increase in liabilities are positive, because the company receive aah or delay the payment of cash.
Work value because it is part of a job
Answer:
The option that does not apply to Parsons (1998) procedural acceptability measure when determining which methods to use to deliver performance feedback to staff is option A). Client treatment acceptability is directly related to procedural acceptability of supervisor feedback to staff.
Explanation:
The study of organizational behavior gives insight on how employees behave and perform in the workplace. It helps us develop an understanding of the aspects that can motivate employees, increase their performance, and help organizations establish a strong and trusting relationship with their employees
OBM can be seen as the intersection between behavioral science and improvement in organizational environments.
According to Parsons (1998) there are numerous reasons it is important to measure procedural acceptability when determining which methods to use to deliver performance feedback to staff such as Staff motivation being impacted if a management practice has low procedural acceptability.
However, Client treatment acceptability is not directly related to procedural acceptability of supervisor feedback to staff.
