Answer:
D. That people of United states have higher standard of living than Japan and Europe.
Explanation:
Answer:
why does andrew jackson justify the native American policy
Answer:
Yes. Such an action constitutes a tort and a crime.
Explanation:
A tort is a wrong done to another person while a crime is the breaking of the law of the state or Federal government. Put simply, a tort is a wrongdoing on a personal level while a crime is a wrongdoing on a societal level, while tort is privately morally wrong, crime is publicly legally wrong.
In the scenario above there is a 'tort' because the employees are spitting into the food of those they do not like. This is on a personal level as they are not spitting into the food of every customer but only the food of those they dislike. Also, a crime exists because this is happening at a public place. It can be said that those restaurants are intentionally serving unhealthy foods to members of the public and both the owners and employees of those restaurants could be charged.
Answer:
Stereotype vulnerability is said to occur when African-American and Latino-American children worry about their performance on intelligence tests. This worry causes anxiety, which distracts them from the test questions and negatively affects their test scores.
Explanation:
<u>Stereotype threat or stereotype vulnerability refers to a situation is which people feel at risk of confirming negative stereotypes. These stereotypes can be related to race, ethnicity, gender, or culture. In other words, children feel the pressure of the preconceived ideas about them </u>- for instance, that they will do worse on the test for being African-American than they would if they were white. <u>The emotions caused by the fear of this threat, the fear of confirming such idea, may interfere in their performance negatively.
</u>
A study confirmed the existence of stereotype threat. Experimenters told black students they tend to perform worse than white students in standardized tests. The students who were not told that ended up performing similarly to the white students. On the other hand, students who were told that performed poorly.
