Answer:
this perspective is inaccurate because characters using informal language doesn’t mean that they’re unintelligent.
Explanation:
it’s the same thing for formal language. there’s a time and place for both informal and formal language. if a bunch of characters are friends and hanging out, then they’d want to use informal language with each other. informal language can also be more realistic to use for characters. for example if all characters in a book are in high school, it would be really unrealistic to have all of them use formal language and walking around talking like they're in a job interview.
those critics are assuming that informal language = unintelligent characters when that is just not true. characters can be intelligent and still use informal language because that’s normal for them or they’re in a place with people where using informal language is better.
The questionable cause fallacy may be considered to have been used in this paragraph, because the causal relationships of the argument were based on a correlation that is not sufficient to prove an argument.
For example, when the author uses the terms:
It is possible to see that there is an informal fallacy of questionable cause, as an event correlated to another may not actually be the cause established by the author.
Therefore, to avoid informal fallacies in a text, it is necessary to have sufficient evidence and grounding to support your argument, through premises that lead to true and proven conclusions.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/18428404
It illustrates that the war has alaready lasted three thousand years and yet it is not at an end. Only God will be able to judge those who drew a sword upon another.
Answer:
oven, microwave, cell phone, computer, and a tablet
Explanation:
i'd choose to keep my phone because why not lol
