1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natima [27]
3 years ago
11

Why do Senators have the ability to block hearings for Presidential appointments?

History
1 answer:
Kipish [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution provides that the President shall appoint officers of the United States “by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate.” This report describes the process by which the Senate provides advice and consent on presidential nominations, including receipt and referral of nominations, committee practices, and floor procedure.

Committees play the central role in the process through investigations and hearings. Senate Rule XXXI provides that nominations shall be referred to appropriate committees “unless otherwise ordered.” Most nominations are referred, although a Senate standing order provides that some “privileged” nominations to specified positions will not be referred unless requested by a Senator. The Senate rule concerning committee jurisdictions (Rule XXV) broadly defines issue areas for committees, and the same jurisdictional statements generally apply to nominations as well as legislation. A committee often gathers information about a nominee either before or instead of a formal hearing. A committee considering a nomination has four options. It can report the nomination to the Senate favorably, unfavorably, or without recommendation, or it can choose to take no action. It is more common for a committee to take no action on a nomination than to reject a nominee outright.

You might be interested in
How does the organization of the Senate allow a small minority of the population to have significant power in the legislative pr
strojnjashka [21]

Answer:

Due to each state having an equal number of senators, states with a small population have the same power in the Senate as states with a larger population

Explanation:

Because each state has 2 senators, states like Wyoming(which has under 600,000 people) have the same power as California(with well over 35 million people). This is actually on purpose, as the writers of the constitution wanted to avoid a situation where Virginia(by far the most populous state at the time of the writing of the constitution) controlled politics in the entire country, especially since the states were much less united in their infancy.

Many people criticize this aspect of the Senate, as it allows a minority of the population to make laws for the majority, but it is still an open question that is actively debated today. The question itself is worded in a way that seems to portray this topic in a negative light, but it's best to maintain an objective tone when answering unless the question asks you to defend a position or your opinion on a topic. I hope this has helped.

3 0
3 years ago
What are the major regions and industries that the agreement addresses Nafta wold positivly affect?
miss Akunina [59]

The major regions and industries that the agreement addresses NAFTA wold positively affect include the following:

  • Canada
  • U. S.
  • Mexico

<h3>What is NAFTA?</h3>

This is referred to as North American Free Trade Agreement and was implemented after an agreement in 1994 between the top three North American economic powers.

The countries which are listed above would be positively affected due to the increase in trading between them thereby resulting in more exports and revenue which can be used as a source for their budget thereby improving the economy.

There will also be an increase in human capital thereby providing different types of jobs for the people. This helps to reduce unemployment rate which produces a ripple effect on the economy .

This is therefore the reason why it was chosen as the most appropriate choice.

Read more about NAFTA here brainly.com/question/27372794

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Which is of these in NOT one of the President's Powers
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer:

A.Chief Negotiator

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anti-Federalists were strongly opposed to
Oksanka [162]

Anti-federalists were those in the U.S. who opposed ratification of the US Constitution.

<h3>Who were anti-federalists?</h3>

These were people who were against the new U.S. Constitution which gave the federal governments more power.

Anti-federalists wanted more power for state governments because they believed that state power should be supreme.

Find out more on anti-federalists at brainly.com/question/857535.

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
What was the great migration? And what was the economic impact on the north?
kolezko [41]

Answer:

Explanation:

This dissertation studies the first Great Migration of African Americans from the rural South to Urban areas in the northern United States. While most existing research has focused on the experiences of the migrants themselves, I am focused on how this influx of rural black migrants impacted outcomes for African Americans who were already living in the north and had already attained a modicum of economic success. Common themes throughout this dissertation involve the use of the complete-count U.S. population census to link records across years. In the first chapter, I linked northern-born blacks from 1910 to 1930 to study how the arrival of new black residents affected the employment outcomes of existing northern-born black residents. I find that southern black migrants served as both competitors and consumers to northern-born blacks in the labor market. In the second chapter, my co-authors and I study the role of segregated housing markets in eroding black wealth during the Great Migration. Building a new sample of matched census addresses from 1930 to 1940, we find that racial transition on a block was associated with both soaring rental prices and declines in the sales value of homes. In other words, black families paid more to rent housing and faced falling values of homes they were able to purchase. Finally, the third chapter compares the rates of intergenerational occupational mobility by both race and region. I find that racial mobility difference in the North was more substantial than it was in the South. However, regional mobility difference for blacks is greater than any gap in intergenerational mobility by race in prewar American. Therefore, the first Great Migration helped blacks successfully translate their geographic mobility into economic mobility.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the early 19th century, Irish immigrants were most likely to settle in???
    5·1 answer
  • Which Soviet Union action was a response to the establishment of the North Atlantic treaty organization?
    11·1 answer
  • Which simulation would work best to find the experimental probability that three people in a group of 22 were born in
    10·2 answers
  • What follows Jedediah Smith’s pathways today?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the importance of language for a policy?
    14·1 answer
  • Principal issues dividing imperialists and anti imperialists
    7·1 answer
  • ano ang tawag sa pagpupulong hindi pag sang ayon sa mga patakaran ng ano mang nakakahadlang sa kalayaan ng mga mamamayan ng isan
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following factors contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire​
    9·2 answers
  • What do you call the Executive Branch at the Local Level?
    7·1 answer
  • The most important food crop grown by Texas farmers was
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!