First you have to know what kind of paper you are writing. IF it's an argumentative paper, than you need to find something involving Halloween parties to argue about. Maybe you would want to argue against Halloween parties, making the claim being that they only encourage unhealthy eating. Or you could argue for them, saying that these parties create community and bring people together, providing fun safe activities that families can enjoy together.
Well then start by defining your terms. Make a general assumption about the kind of people likely to show up at a Halloween party. you can divide them into groups based on their characteristics and their traits, like the people who dress up versus those who don't. Then you can explain in following paragraphs why and how you classified them into these categories. also in a following paragraph you can detail the motives of why classification of these groups is important. you could also divide them up into sub-categories. Such as for those who dress up: do they dress up as something scary or something funny? finally in your conclusion you can restate your classifications by paraphrasing your topic statements of each paragraph.
Using slang is considered inappropriate in a business setting because slang displays a tone that is too casual. It is also considered unprofessional and shows a lack of respect for the recipient of the communication. Inappropriate communication can damage the relationships between your clients and your business. It is very important to be able to communicate in a professional, formal manner across all communication platforms from email to written communication to verbal communications. Good communication skills form the backbone of any business.
Answer:
B, unsure about the new experience.
Explanation:
if you look in the writing, you can see key sentences that had a hint of worry and hesitation to them. for example "pressed for time, I finally decided it was safe enough to try."
The correct answer is B. They suspect something strange may be going on.
Explanation
According to the fragment, it can be inferred that the central theme of the discussion between Charlie and Steve is about a strange fact that caught their attention and they are going to check what has happened. In addition, they discard the option that it was a meteorite as Steve says "It couldn't be the meteor. A meteor couldn't do this". According to the above, the correct answer is B because they can not explain the event that just happened.
The context clues show that Joseph knows his people elder's have kept the way going too long.
<h3>What we context clues?</h3>
It should be noted that context clues are the hints that are his by the author in the literary work.
In this case, the context clues show that Joseph knows his people elder's have kept the way going too long.
Learn more about context clues on:
brainly.com/question/11247029
#SPJ1
