I would argue that the scientific method wasn't very revolutionary during the scientific revolution seeing as it existed for hundreds of years. i think it was one of the ancient Greek or roman philosophers that first developed a series of thought that closely resembles the scientific method we know today. however another interpretation of the question is in the definition of revolution. the scientific revolution wasn't bloody like the British/french/american revolution. however the " dictionary definition" of revolution is completing an orbit. in that sense you could consider the scientific revolution a misnomer. in conclusion i think that the ways in which the scientific revolution differed from other revolts are numerous.
Answer:
Explanation:
Germany initially became part of the first World War due to the treaty it had with Austria-Hungary, which had declared war on Serbia due to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. France and Russia were both also party to the war on the Allies side due to Russia's treaty with Serbia and France's treaty with Russia
Answer: A
Explanation: 26,277 Americans were killed in the Battle of Argonne Forest
No, didn't really fit the issue. Congress were the ones who lowered the taxes.
Answer:
Is this what you're looking for?
Explanation:
Egypt developed around the Nile River, while Mesopotamia developed between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. ... Politically, both Egypt and Mesopotamia had a government with one main ruler, but Egypt had a centralized government with a pharaoh, while Mesopotamia had a decentralized government with a king.
