1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedbober [7]
2 years ago
14

What stood out to you / caught your attention in the video? Describe.

History
1 answer:
fiasKO [112]2 years ago
7 0
How very large and encrusted his chest was it was quite amazing
You might be interested in
Why do the thirteen English colonies develop similar political systems while maintaining differing social systems?
drek231 [11]

Answer:

Today, if you want to learn about the American government, it's pretty simple. Ok, simple may not be the right word, but my point is that the federal government works the same way no matter where you are in the country. Things in Georgia are run pretty much the same way they are in Massachusetts. This was not always the case. Georgia, Massachusetts, and the rest of the original 13 colonies were all under the control of the British Empire, but were operated as independent colonies. This means that each one was set up a little bit different, with different systems of government. And, you thought it was hard to figure out our government now.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why was the south angry about lincoln’s election as President
OleMash [197]
They were convinced Lincoln was going to end slavery
5 0
3 years ago
i will give brainliest 5 stars and thank you please. According to the Justices, how can we combat the greatest threat to an inde
andreev551 [17]
The way to achieve this impartiality – to free judges to decide cases based on what the law actually requires, and on nothing else – is to ensure that the judiciary is independent, or, put differently, not subject to reprisals for decisions on the bench.

But judicial independence is not an absolute or singular value defining our courts. The principle of judicial restraint is equally important – and it is inextricably linked to judicial independence. At one level, the tension between the two seems inescapable. But there is an important sense in which an independent judiciary and judicial restraint are flip sides of the same coin. Both aim to minimize the influence of extraneous factors on judicial decision-making. A judge must not decide a case with an eye toward public approbation, because whether a particular result is popular is irrelevant to whether it is legally sound. In the same way, a judge must not consult
3 0
2 years ago
In the Presidential Election of<br> 2000, which candidate won the<br> popular vote?
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer: Al Gore Won the Popular Vote

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
In 1804, the louisiana territory was what fraction of the united states' total land?
Amanda [17]
It was 1/2 of the united states total land.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are three acquisitions that greatly expanded the territory of America before the Civil War?
    15·1 answer
  • After the Civil War, what was the goal of Southern Democrats who supported the idea of Redemption?
    8·2 answers
  • What were the goals of the Congress of Vienna? We’re they successful?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following has the Supreme Court decided in dealing with First Amendment cases involving religion?
    11·1 answer
  • Can you help me with history?
    10·1 answer
  • Why are cases in the U.S. Supreme Court called oral arguments instead of trials?
    15·2 answers
  • What conditions existed in Mexico that led American settlers to feel discontented in Texas?
    9·1 answer
  • What happened after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand that led to ​ World War I ​ ?
    8·2 answers
  • Explain how Buddhism diffused after the Tang Dynasty
    5·1 answer
  • Which major contribution did Mohandas Gandhi make to the Indian
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!