Answer: C) It is a dependent clause.
Explanation: an independent clause is a sentence that has complete meaning on its own (it has at least a subject, a verb and all the necessary complements), a dependent clause is the contrary, is a phrase that, in order to make sense, it needs to be with an independent clause. The given excerpt is a clear example of a dependent clause, because as we can see, it doesn't have complete sense, we can tell that it is missing something.
More properly, question words can be called ‘interrogative’ words.
<u>Who – What – Where – Why – Which – When – Whose – Whom – How</u>
‘Can’, ‘should’ and ‘would’ are other words used to ask questions in English. These words tend to require a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer, or an affirmative. Since these question word lead to an expected answer, they are not really questions.
You could use transition words like finally or in conclusion
To tell your reader everything you will say.
The correct answer isC) Logos.
<em>The rethorical device used in the sentence is logos.
</em>
Taking into consideration that the sentence says that “the Japanese Ambassador delivered a formal reply”, we can assume that diplomatic formal reply used logos, the reason, arguments, because in diplomacy that is the language is used to convey ideas between countries, and furthermore, in this case, the relationship between the United States and Japan were of much tension. Both countries were on a brink of war.
