All categories

2 years ago

Please help me drag top to bottem

Mathematics

2 answers:

Naily [24]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

5.03709

4.923935

Square root 17

Square root 12

Step-by-step explanation:

Square root of 17 = 4.12310562562

Square root of 12 = 3.46410161514

s2008m [1.1K]2 years ago

4 0

5.03709...

4.923935...

√17

√12

You might be interested in

Please help!!!!!!!!!!

MatroZZZ [7]

Step-by-step explanation:

Left side: 18cm

Under that: 5cm

5cm again

Perimeter = 76

Because: 20 + 18 + 18 + 5 +5 +5 +5 = 76

7 0

2 years ago

If Juan deposits $4,600 in a saving account that earns 3.8% compound continuously, how much money should he expect to be in the

Sindrei [870]

$104,880?
Pretty sure this may be the answers. If not what are the answer choices?

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the slope of the line?

Oduvanchick [21]

Answer:

rise over run

Step-by-step explanation:

how much it goes up over how far it goes to the side

4 0

2 years ago

Which triangle always has only two sides the same length and one angle that measures 90°? A. acute scalene B. right isosceles C.

Otrada [13]

Right isosceles, which has two sides the same length and one angle that measures 90 degrees.

5 0

3 years ago

Hey so im also looking for the first answer and the choices were “ is not “ and “ is “

dexar [7]

so the investigator found the skid marks were 75 feet long hmmm what speed will that be?

$s=\sqrt{30fd}~~ \begin{cases} f=\stackrel{friction}{factor}\\ d=\stackrel{skid}{feet}\\[-0.5em] \hrulefill\\ f=\stackrel{dry~day}{0.7}\\ d=75 \end{cases}\implies s=\sqrt{30(0.7)(75)}\implies s\approx 39.69~\frac{m}{h}$

nope, the analysis shows that Charlie was going faster than 35 m/h.

now, assuming Charlie was indeed going at 35 m/h, then his skid marks would have been

$s=\sqrt{30fd}~~ \begin{cases} f=\stackrel{friction}{factor}\\ d=\stackrel{skid}{feet}\\[-0.5em] \hrulefill\\ f=\stackrel{dry~day}{0.7}\\ s=35 \end{cases}\implies 35=\sqrt{30(0.7)d} \\\\\\ 35^2=30(0.7)d\implies \cfrac{35^2}{30(0.7)}=d\implies 58~ft\approx d$

4 0

2 years ago