Question 1
answer: one inference that can be made is that the narrators mother does not care about Chinese culture involving women’s work. She wants to work regardless.
question 2
answer: “But why shouldn’t i?” she argued. “Lots of peoples mothers work”
hope this helps :)
Answer:
someone who believes that they have no control over an inevitable future
Explanation:
The definition of a Fatalist is a person who believes that all events are inevitable, so one’s choices and actions make no difference. So the answer I pick is correct.
Answer:
Explanation:
Your best choice is B, opposite of the word hamper. If you suppose someone, you are trying to help them. If you hamper them, you are trying to stop them from doing something.
So A is wrong.
C is also incorrect. If they are opposite in meaning, one of the words will not define the other.
D is nonsense. As an answer it has no meaning. Parts of speech means verbs and nouns and pronouns etc. None of them are supports.
Indefinite pronouns are used to refer to nonspecific people, things or places. In this way, the speaker uses -body or -one to refer to people, and -thing to indicate objects. As a general rule, these pronouns are consider to be in the singular form so the verb has to agree with it.
It is important to highlight that “Nothing” is used in negative sentences (example: Nobody worked yesterday.)
"Something" is used for unknown or nonspecific object and it is appears in affirmative sentences.(Example: I saw something in the kitchen).
“Everything” is used to refer to a total amount of nonspecific objects and it appears in affirmative sentences.(Example: I bought everything yesterday).
Situational irony!
Because, she initially thought she was free from her husbands wrath. She celebrated and her heart was happy, this only to end with such a heartbreak that it kills her.
