Answer:
Globalization has lowered wages for American workers
while Canadians believe that globalization has “helped raise the standard of living for many poor people around the world”
Technolgy influenced many variables throughout time, such as imperial expansion, knowledge of the environment, better medical development, and many other things. If we didn't have the technological advancements that we did throughout the ages, the world would be very different from today. Many things could have gone astray and history would be very different. For example, if boats were never invented, immigration and exploration would be almost non-existent, and the Americas wouldn't have been discovered by Europe. Another thing that would have changed is international trade, trading between countries would be impossible without the use of boats unless the countries were connected by land.
Hope this helps :)
I am going to say True, I mean usually when you put in effort you get the results you want.
Answer:
intuitionist
Explanation:
An intuitionist type of morality entails that model of moral reasoning that makes a judgment off intuition, then later tries to reflect if the judgment was reasoned through in the correct manner.
Here an individual just goes ahead to make a judgement from his intuition, but will later go back to analyse if the was rightly passed or not.
The people act intuitively during laboratory games, hence, desire to punish wrongdoings is driven mostly by automatic emotional reactions rather than by deliberate conscious calculations.
Answer:
The given question is incomplete; options are missing.
The missing options are:
A. valid because this conclusion is believable.
B. valid because this is indeed a valid syllogism and the logic is apparent.
C. invalid because this syllogism does not involve a pragmatic reasoning schema.
D. invalid because of the influence of the atmosphere effect.
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Syllogism is a rhetorical device used to draw a conclusion about certain arguments(premise). It is a form of logical reasoning.
A syllogism can be divided into three parts:
- Minor premise
- Major Premise
- Conclusion
In the given case, the major premise is <em>"some tired people are irritable" </em>because it is stating a fact;<em> "all of the students are tired"</em> is a minor premise that is specifying a statement, and <em>"some of the students are irritable"</em> is a conclusion drawn from the major and minor premise.
This syllogism will be considered valid because the conclusion is believable.
