Explanation:
- It encourages people community to post their news
- The news can be posted for a group or to a general public too
- The group or the general public can comment on the news
- The news which is interesting based on the reviews will be given the top priority
Example:
Reddit - A large site with huge number of user
Digg - This is also quite popular and it has different categories of news where the user can view news based on his/her interest.
Answer:
See explanation below.
Explanation:
1. Equity: the value of a property above any loans that are owed.
2. Lease: a payment in a series that is made over a long period of time installment, to buy something on credit.
3. Finance: a legal agreement to borrow money for the purchase of a home.
4. Mortgage: a legal agreement allowing a person to use a car or property for a payment.
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
Answer:
Either you quit trying and lose $800 sunk, or you spend $800 for $1,600 total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600. That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
Explanation:
Since $800 has been spent which means Spending up to an additional $1,000 is still reasonable, but a condition in which you know that the deal will definitely go through.
Secondly since you have already sunk $800, and you know that spending an additional $800 would guarantee it, you can do one among this two options which are either you stop trying and lose the $800 sunk, or you the spend $800 for $1,600($1,000+$600) total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600($1,000-$800=200,$800-$200=$600). That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
