Answer:
read below :)
Explanation:
a) Sociology is the study of people where as Social Psychology is the study of people in a group/social context
Sociology will focus on the structures that are part of society, and they will target them as part of bigger frameworks. For example institutions like Marriage will be given their part, along other higher institutions like economics and politics.
b) Social Psychology bridges the gap between sociology and psychology
Social psychology applies the findings of psychology when it concerns the actions and how they are influenced in the presence of others: If an action occurs as a result of others or together with a group, then this practice will be studied.
Classical examples involve how people perform or react when they are being part of a group. How is this performance a result or changes according to the social setting wil be the focus.
c) When noticing something that by be news, the journanilst will account for an event trying to publish and inform in the light of his opinion. Often the way he describes the news, will reveal the affiliation or the stand he has in a subject. There will be more room for being subjective or bias.
The answers are academic and social competence and decrease drug use in adulthood. The capacity to delay gratification is the ability to defer instant urges to obtain a more valuable reward. Several studies were conducted to prove the veracity of this theory. Researchers linked the success of certain individuals in their adulthood to their ability to postpone immediate satisfaction during their preschool stage.
Answer: variable
Explanation:
Any factor with more than one value
Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
1. The Boston Sons of Liberty showed their opposition on December 16, 1773, when they threw tea being brought into the American colonies by the British East India Company overboard the sea. The event is known as the Boston Tea Party and it was a result of the <em>Tea Act</em> passed by the British Parliament who gave their company the monopoly to import tea to the colonies.
2. I think that they decided to destroy the tea because if it got to the American colonies, they would be bought by people and this would affect the sales of tea by the American traders who sourced their tea from the Dutch. The taxes imposed on this tea as well as the monopoly that was granted to the British East India Company would also have negative consequences on the economy of the colonists.
3. They might have allowed the tea to land and then explain to the people reasons why they should boycott it. I do not think that this would have been effective because some people would have still found a way to buy the tea once it was within their reach.
4. Activism, lobbying, dialogue with the appropriate authorities, and peaceful protests should be the best routes to consider in countering laws perceived as unjust by the American citizenry.
The answer is "moral self-evaluation".
Moral self-evaluation
is a method to efficiently watch, examine and esteem your own moral activity
and its outcomes with a specific end goal to settle or enhance it. The degree
of guilt felt by an individual will depend on how strongly they morally evaluate
themselves. To morally self-evaluate implies that individuals investigate and
assess their own selves.
