The right answer is D, Conflict Theory, This theory is part of the modern sociology and explains when a conflict transcends the individual and reaches a position or social level. Social conflicts are usually due to the scope of power, status or resources that the society they want to neutralize possesses.
I hope my answer can help you.
Answer:
Beneficence.
Explanation:
Principle of beneficence can be defined as a moral obligation of researchers, physicians or scientists to act in a way that is beneficial to others, prevent and remove conditions that could be harmful, and rescue individuals that are in danger.
This ultimately implies that, the principle of beneficence is an ethical or moral rule that is mainly focused on promoting actions that are good and beneficial to others while limiting any potential for harm.
Hence, the principle of beneficence means that researchers should attempt to maximize the benefits of participation and take steps to identify and limit the potential for harm
The best explanation for Donald's experience is Paris French is a kind of cultural capital that helps open doors to opportunity.
<h3>What is a cultural capital?</h3>
This is a term that is used to describe the social assets that a person has. The cultural capital of a person has to do with all of the following
- Their education
- Their intellect
- How they speak
- How they dress
Donald does not have the ability to speak the same way with these people yet due to difference in his kind of French.
Read more on cultural capital here:
brainly.com/question/5923187
People ( especially new parents.) instead of being consistent they only use punishment for things that originally they didn't pay attention to.
They could also use abusive words while punishing their child which is damaging and defeats the purpose of Discipline. Discipline isn't punishment. It's a word meaning To teach. Punishment just goes along with discipline if the child doesn't respond to the teaching.
DO NOT spank at the first offence the child commits. First, make sure they know what they did was wrong, second initiate a discussion on how it made you feel and what you expected of them. Forgive the first offence. Second offence, talk about how you told them last time and if they understood. Mild punishment ( time out, no TV whichever you wish.)
Third offence. Spanking. Ask them if they know what they did was wrong, find out and then deliver the punishment in a calm manner, not out of anger.
And don't say anything to them afterwards, leave them to have their cry and then come back after a bit and accept their apology and tell them you love them and that you want them to be happy and ask them if they're happy when they're good and obey you. They will see they can talk to you and that you're not unreasonable and that the punishments were not unexpected or out of anger.
99% of spankings are used because the parents are angry or because they don't know of any other solutions. I've seen good kids raised with spankings, and bad kids raised with spankings. Spankings is a Tool, the one using the tool is the one at fault for how they do it.
