37 your welcome you have to add 3 and ll but u have to work perenthesis first it's like pemdas and u have your answer
Answer: His taxable income: 26,800 - 5,500 = 21,300
15% of his taxable income: 21,300 * 0.15 = 3,195
Step-by-step explanation:


<h2 />
Step-by-step explanation:

- <u>simplify</u><u> the</u><u> expression</u><u> </u><u>us</u><u>i</u><u>Ng the </u><u>symmetry</u><u> of</u><u> </u><u>trigonometry</u>
<u>
</u>
<h2>
<u>hope</u><u> it</u><u> helps</u></h2>
Answer:
<u>Explanatory variable</u> (independent variable)
- The variable that affects the other variable.
- Drawn along the horizontal axis.
<u>Response variable</u> (dependent variable)
- The variable that is being affected.
- Drawn up the vertical axis.
(a) As the class wondered if they could <em>predict the father's height</em>, when they<em> know the son's height</em>
Explanatory variable = son's height
Response variable = father's height
(even though this is contrary to real-life, where the father's height would be used to predict the son's height)
(b) **see first attachment**
(c) The association is positive since the father's height increases as the son's height increases.
(d) **see second attachment**
Outlier = Paul (64.5, 73)
This point is far away from the majority of points on the scatter plot.
If we add a regression line to the scatter plot, we can see that this data point is the farthest from the regression line.
The difference 96 -80 = 16 is a factor of both numbers, so is the greatest common factor.
96 + 80 = 16*(6 + 5)