Answer:
(c) $95,400
Step-by-step explanation:
You want the listing price of your house such that you can clear $92,500 after paying a 3% commission to the buyer's realtor.
<h3>Setup</h3>
The buyer's agent will receive 3% of the sale price (P), so you receive that amount less. You want your share to be $92,500.
(1 -3%)P = 92,500
<h3>Solution</h3>
Dividing by the coefficient of P, we get ...
P = 92,500/0.97 ≈ 95,361
We are asked to round this value to the nearest $100. That makes the listing price ...
$95,400 . . . . listing price
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
You can estimate the listing price by adding 3% of 92500 to that value, and you can estimate the added amount as 3%×90,000 = 2700. That is, you know the listing price needs to be slightly higher than ...
92500 +2700 = 95,200
Only one of the answer choices is above that value and <em>rounded to the nearest $100</em>. (You can eliminate the first two choices, because they are not properly rounded.)
Answer:
30
Step-by-step explanation:
Substitute the x in the expression with a -5 and substitute the y in the expression with a 6
2(-5)+8(6)
-10+40
30
<em>I am against people doing this.</em>
<em>I think it's wrong because for some reason scientists are permitted to do this but that is breaking the law. I hate how they do it because these are just innocent animals that did nothing wrong to us, our scientists just decide it's ok to go stick needles in them and put stuff on them. My biggest problem with this is that they don't care about the effects their products have on innocent animals and instead of fixing their mistake and just apply it to humans, they just keep on going like there's no tomorrow. Animals have done nothing wrong to these people and I think that it's wrong to do so. Also, I don't really think that this proves anything. An animal's skin and fur are different than a human's skin and hair so it would make no sense to test these things on them because it really is guaranteed to give an accurate answer. Animals differ from us in so many ways that you should be able to think that scientists wouldn't harm these lovely creatures, but instead, they do. Why do scientists hurt these animals? I don't want to live in a world with hurt animals, especially when some of them have World Records, like the Sea Otter.</em>
<em>-R3TR0 Z3R0</em>
First you have to multiply the 0.6 of the small shakers times two which gives us 1.2 the amount of salt of the large shakers. divide the 18.6 by 1.2 which is 15.5 the amount going into the 8 shakers. Then subtract 15.5 from 18.6 which gives us 3.1. Then you divide that by 0.6 = 5. 5 small shakers can be filled with the remaining salt.
