All categories

3 years ago

When lines are parallel...

Mathematics

1 answer:

Otrada [13]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

1) Congruent

2) Supplementary

3) Congruent

4) Congruent

Step-by-step explanation:

1) The Alternate Interior Angles Theorem states that, when two parallel lines are cut by a transversal , the resulting alternate interior angles are congruent .

2) Formally, we can say that if two lines are parallel, then consecutive interior angles are supplementary. We refer to this as the consecutive interior angles postulate.

3) When the lines are parallel, the corresponding angles are congruent . When two lines are cut by a transversal, the pairs of angles on one side of the transversal and inside the two lines are called the consecutive interior angles.

4) The Alternate Exterior Angles Theorem states that, when two parallel lines are cut by a transversal , the resulting alternate exterior angles are congruent.

You might be interested in

6636=3 8118=4 2212=0 8688=? 5971=?

pochemuha

6636 has 3 circle so 6636=3
8118 has 4 circle so 8118=4
2212 has 0 circle so 2212=0
8688 has 7 circle 8688=7
5971 has 1 circle 5971=1

6 0

2 years ago

Y- (z + x - 2); use x = 4, y = 5, and z = 2 Please evaluate using the values given

frez [133]

It's gonna be 5 - (2 + 4 -2)
according to order of operations, we have to solve inside the parentheses/brackets first (from left to right)

therefore, it will be
5 - (6 - 2)
=5 - (4)

Next, distribute the negative to the four and add normally.

= 5 - 4
= 1

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which weights more 2.48 or 2.5

Mazyrski [523]

2.5 weighs more. It’s a greater number than 2.48

6 0

3 years ago

The Salk polio vaccine experiment in 1954 focused on the effectiveness of the vaccine in combating paralytic polio. Because it w

sdas [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The variables of interest are:

X₁: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the placebo vaccine.

n₁= 201299 total children studied

x₁= 110 cases observed

X₂: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the experimental vaccine.

n₂= 200745 total children studied

x₂= 33 cases observed

These two variables have a binomial distribution. The parameters of interest, the ones to compare, are the population proportions: p₁ vs p₂

You have to test if the population proportions of children who contracted polio in both groups are different: p₂ ≠ p₁

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.05

$Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }$

Sample proportion placebo p'₁= x₁/n₁= 110/201299= 0.0005

Sample proportion vaccine p'₂= x₂/n₂= 33/200745= 0.0002

Pooled sample proportion p'= (x₁+x₂)/(n₁+n₂)= (110+33)/(201299+200745)= 0.0004

$Z_{H_0}= \frac{(0.0002-0.0005)-0}{\sqrt{0.0004[\frac{1}{201299} +\frac{1}{200745} ]} }= -4.76$

This test is two-tailed, using the critical value approach, you have to determine two critical values:

$Z_{\alpha/2}= Z_{0.025}= -1.96$

$Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.975}= 1.96$

Then if $Z_{H_0}$ ≤ -1.96 or if $Z_{H_0}$ ≥ 1.96, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -1.96 < $Z_{H_0}$ < 1.96, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ $Z_{H_0}$ = -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.01

$Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }$

The value of $Z_{H_0}$ = -4.76 doesn't change, since we are working with the same samples.

The only thing that changes alongside with the level of significance is the rejection region:

$Z_{\alpha /2}= Z_{0.005}= -2.576$

$Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.995}= 2.576$

Then if $Z_{H_0}$ ≤ -2.576or if $Z_{H_0}$ ≥ 2.576, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -2.576< $Z_{H_0}$ < 2.576, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ $Z_{H_0}$ = -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

Remember the level of significance (probability of committing type I error) is the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis. This means that the smaller this value is, the fewer chances you have of discarding the true null hypothesis. But as you know, you cannot just reduce this value to zero because, the smaller α is, the bigger β (probability of committing type II error) becomes.

Rejecting the null hypothesis using different values of α means that there is a high chance that you reached a correct decision (rejecting a false null hypothesis)

I hope this helps!

8 0

3 years ago

Pls help ill give a 100 jusrt answer these question and ill even give brainliest

mojhsa [17]

Answer:

That is a lot of questions to answer. But I will try.

a) 6 square units

b) 5/6

Second picture

1. Area = 6

2. Area = 4.5

3. Area = 20

4. Area = 9

5. Area = 17.5

Third picture

a) 8 units because if you move the bottom triangle to the top of the other triangle it makes a rectangle with height of 2 and length of 4.

I'm sorry I have to go I would love to finish this but I hope what I gave helps you!

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers