All categories

3 years ago

PLS help it’s due tomorrow I’ll give brainless

Mathematics

1 answer:

levacccp [35]3 years ago

3 0

3x+2y=8
2y=-3x+8
y=(-3/2)x+4
The slope of the line that is perpendicular to this is 2/3
The perpendicular line passes through the y-intercept of this line, which is 4
The equation of the perpendicular line is:
y= (2/3)x+4

You might be interested in

The heights of a certain type of tree are approximately normally distributed with a mean height p = 5 ft and a standard

arsen [322]

Answer:

A tree with a height of 6.2 ft is 3 standard deviations above the mean

Step-by-step explanation:

⇒ $1^s^t$ statement: A tree with a height of 5.4 ft is 1 standard deviation below the mean(FALSE)

an X value is found Z standard deviations from the mean mu if:

$\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma} = Z$

In this case we have: $\mu=5\ ft$ $\sigma=0.4\ ft$

We have four different values of X and we must calculate the Z-score for each

For X =5.4\ ft

$Z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\\Z=\frac{5.4-5}{0.4}=1$

Therefore, A tree with a height of 5.4 ft is 1 standard deviation above the mean.

⇒ $2^n^d$ statement:A tree with a height of 4.6 ft is 1 standard deviation above the mean. (FALSE)

For X =4.6 ft

$Z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\\Z=\frac{4.6-5}{0.4}=-1$

Therefore, a tree with a height of 4.6 ft is 1 standard deviation below the mean .

⇒ $3^r^d$ statement:A tree with a height of 5.8 ft is 2.5 standard deviations above the mean (FALSE)

For X =5.8 ft

$Z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\\Z=\frac{5.8-5}{0.4}=2$

Therefore, a tree with a height of 5.8 ft is 2 standard deviation above the mean.

⇒ $4^t^h$ statement:A tree with a height of 6.2 ft is 3 standard deviations above the mean. (TRUE)

For X =6.2\ ft

$Z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\\Z=\frac{6.2-5}{0.4}=3$

Therefore, a tree with a height of 6.2 ft is 3 standard deviations above the mean.

6 0

4 years ago

Need the answer on this

denpristay [2]

None of the answers are correct because it’s definitely not “Given” because x=20 is like an answer. It’s also not “Distributive Property”, “subtraction Property”, and or “Additional Property” b/c there’s nothing that can be distributed, subtract or add. It’s just an answer.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Write 66² as a product of its prime factors Please ill award brainlist

mestny [16]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

the image above explains it

8 0

2 years ago

Find the unit rate: $9.60 for 8 cans. $ per can

Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

$1.20

Step-by-step explanation:

960÷8=120 :)))))))

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which biconditional is not a good definition?

Xelga [282]

The correct answers are:

A ray is a bisector of an angle if and only if it splits the angle into two angles; and
A) I can afford to buy a ticket.

Explanation:

For the first question, the first three answers are very specific and true:

A whole number is odd if it is not divisible by 2, and a number is not divisible by 2 if it is odd;
an angle is straight if its measure is 180 degrees, and the measure of an angle is 180 degrees if it is a straight angle;
a whole number is even if it is divisible by 2, and a number is divisible by 2 if it is even.

However, with the fourth choice, we are missing a key word in the definition. A ray is a bisector of an angle if and only if it splits the angle into two CONGRUENT angles. It is not just a ray that cuts an angle into two pieces, the pieces must be equal.

For the second question, the Law of Detachment says if our conditional "if p, then q" is true and p is true, then q must also be true.

For this question, "I can go to the concert if I can afford to buy a ticket" is true as well as "I can go to the concert." This means "I can afford to buy a ticket" must be true as well.

4 0

3 years ago