Answer:
A) The Mauryan Empire expanded over nearly the entire region of what is now modern day India. Starting with Chandragupta and ending with his grandson Ashoka, the empire was expanded over a span roughly a hundred years. This was not an easy task because of the size of the land to be conquered. The area that is now known to be modern day India, is a peninsula. The Arabian Sea borders the land on the west, the Indian ocean borders it to the south and the Bay of Bengal borders it to the east. The Himalaya Mountains separated the rest of east Asia, including China, from the Mauryan Empire. The Hindu Kush Mountains to the north west of the Mauryan Empire separated it from the rest of the Middle East. The monsoon cycle effected the Mauryan Empire as well. High rainfall often lead to reoccurring floods and in the winter, especially inland, there was a lack of rainfall and that lead to droughts. Needless to say, it was hard to sustain a surplus of agriculture throughout the year. The location was still beneficial despite this. Trade over sea to east Asia flourished. the size of the subcontinent of India lead to the development of several languages in different and separate regions of the land. This is the reason why the development of the Mauryan Empire was is so important in history. That the empire existed is a testament to the strength of the rulers at the time to unify such a vast region.
B) There isn't much of a difference in geography between the Mauryan and the Gupta empires as the Gupta Empire was the predecessor of the Mauryan. This meant that the Gupta empire inherited the land owned by the Mauryan Empire. One obvious difference between the two empires is that the Gupta Empire was smaller that the Mauryan. The Gupta Empire is located in the northern region of the subcontinent underneath the Himalayan and Hindu Kush mountains. The people of the Gupta Empire where better adapted to the Monsoon cycle by building high houses to accommodate the floods. Because of this they were able to flourish agriculturally, boasting their economy.
Explanation:
Your welcome and have a nice day!
India<span> greatly influenced Southeast Asia beginning around 200 BC until the 15</span>th century. During this<span> time, </span>Hindu-Buddhis influence was absorbed by politics. India had initially built trade, cultural and political relations with Southeast Asian countries like Thailand, Malay Peninsula, Thailand, Cambodia, Burma, and even Vietnam. For more than a hundred years, the cultural exchanges between India and other Southeast Asian countries has been called "Indianisation<span>". </span>Indianisation<span> led to major transfers of Indian religious, politics, and artistic features to these countries.</span><span> </span>
No, it was not. The main reason the U.S. joined the war was to stop the spread of communism, however, they did not achieve that because the Communist North won. Furthermore, it caused tension within the country, and our beloved nationalism was not there. It caused outrage and many protests. The people of the U.S. became tired of the loss of people and many began to see our government as weak.<span />
The answer is A.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Nationalism was a central driving force in the unification of both Italy and Germany. This ideology, which emerged during the French Revolution and the era of the Napoleonic invasion, became a central feature of the XIX Century Europe. It consisted of the idea that each nation (people that shared a common language, history, customs, etc) should have its own State, that is why Nationalism united people of the same nationality in a single unified political entity. In the case of Germany, it created a single State after three wars occurred (against Denmark- 1861, Austria-1866, and France- 1871), a state that remained under the influence of the former Kingdom of Prussia. On the other hand, the Kingdom of Italy was created after the Italians could eliminate the influence of foreign powers ever the Italian Peninsula after three independence wars. The new kingdom was created around the figure of Victor Emmanuel II. However, nationalism would also function as a driving force: it was one of the main reasons why several wars occurred during the XIX Century, like the independence wars discussed above. Furthermore, it would act not only as a centripetal but also as a centrifugal force in the European political geography: many multinational empires would suffer recurrent crises and revolutions organized by different national minorities who wanted to create their own national state. What is more, Nationalism, the nationalist ideal, is believed to have been one of the main causes of the First World War. Also, nationalism was also linked with more extreme political ideas, such as state racism and segregation of minorities.
Explanation:
