Hey there,
<span>Nina's behavior is best explained by the circumstances surrounding the encounter.
Hope this helps :))
~Top
</span>
Answer:
Option A, Self Efficacy
Explanation:
Self Efficacy depicts the belief of an individual that he/she has the capability to manage any situation by executing required course of action. It is a firm belief of an individual that he/she is able enough to succeed in a given situation.
Social responsibility depicts responsibilities of an individual towards the society and hence this option is incorrect
Reciprocal determinism outlines the behavioral changes in an individual due to cognitive processes and environmental factors Hence, option C is also incorrect
Option D is also incorrect because self monitoring means to keep a check on oneself actions and behavior.
Answer:
It strengthened the role of the judicial branch of government.
It affirmed the principle of judicial review.
Explanation:
The famous case of Marbury v. Madison of 1803 resulted from the last-minute appointments- "midnight judges" by outgoing President John Adams mere hours before the succeeding president Thomas Jefferson comes to the office. This appointment resulted in the conflict of what power trumps the other.
President John Adams appointed William Marbury along with several others as justices of the peace hours before he was to step down as President. By the time the next president Jefferson came to office, the commission of Marbury along with some others was still left undelivered. Marbury then took the new Secretary of State John Marshall to court, asking for his commission to be delivered.
This resulted in the court deciding which power decides which fate, confirming the power of judicial review and strengthening the role of the judicial branch. The Supreme Court directed that if any act of Congress is in conflict with the interest of the Constitution, then it can annul any acts it deems unconstitutional.
Thus, the correct answers are the first and third options.
Answer:
The trial court focus on presentation of the evidence and examination of the witnesses while appellate courts there are no any kind of witnesses.
Explanation:
In trial court, both sides of the groups present the evidence to show the version of them to the court of what happened. Most of evidence which are presented in trial court comes from the witnesses and exhibits.
On the other side, in appellate courts, witnesses are not there, and any kind of the evidence is not presented. In the appellate courts, lawyers simply argue the legal and the policy issues before judges.
