1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klemol [59]
2 years ago
10

If you listen to rock Screamo-indie what is your faviort band

Social Studies
1 answer:
Dafna1 [17]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

does one direction count??

You might be interested in
The pronatalist bias is related to the fatalistic motivation for parenthood. (points : 1) true false
julia-pushkina [17]
It is <span>false that the pr</span><span>onatalist bias is related to the fatalistic motivation for parenthood. It is actually t</span><span>he idea of having kids is the normal or correct thing to do where as not having kids requires an explanation.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
What are some examples of a sharecropper?
Marta_Voda [28]
Sharecropping<span> is a form of agriculture in which a landowner allows a tenant to use the land in return for a share of the crops produced on their portion of land.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read the research question.
Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

How are online users experiencing addressing privacy issues on social networking sites?

Explanation:

A research question is a question which a group of researchers seeks to answer and it is important as an element of quantitative and qualitative research. Getting the answer to the research question requires data collection and analysis.

Therefore, the best revision of the research question, "Are social networking sites harmful?" is <u>How are online users experiencing addressing privacy issues on social networking sites?</u>

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What legal tools did the Roman republic use to uphold the rule of law
nata0808 [166]
There were several ways in which the Roman republic used to uphold the rule of law, but almost all of them had to do with threats of violence and/or capital punishment. 
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to Hanfeizi what was the only way to create a strong Society
    11·1 answer
  • Abstract art become so popular in Latin art Circle in the early 1900s?what you think
    9·1 answer
  • The tendency of organizations to become increasingly dominated by small groups of people.
    6·2 answers
  • When president Obama signed affordable Care Act into law,FOX News abd CNN presented Vastly different view points of the CAA, app
    10·1 answer
  • Who are the "invisible minority?"
    13·1 answer
  • You are working with an individual with cerebral palsy who has just received a new speech generating device as part of the imple
    5·1 answer
  • In the Arab world, enslaved people were often<br><br> Arab.<br> Asian.<br> Indian.<br> European.
    8·2 answers
  • The type of currency used by the United Kingdom is the __________. A. euro B. dollar C. pound D. shekel
    9·1 answer
  • Select if the description is Fish, Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds, or Mammals. Some will have more than one answer.
    11·2 answers
  • How did rome go from a farming settlment into a republic
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!