Answer:
B.) Shah Abbas welcomed the Christian Armenians into separate communities to take advantage of their trade alliances, while the Mughals worked to create a blended culture.
Explanation:
You didn't write the all the answer choices, but this is the right answer. Think about your knowledge about the Mughal Empire. How did they treat the Hindus? Did Akbar force the Hindu majority convert to Islam? Did Akbar allow religious tolerance? Well, yes he did. He did allow religious tolerance so then that narrows down to B and C. B and C says almost the same thing for the second part except one thing. If you look in the passage, how did Abbas treat the Armenians? He gave them important privileges, and decided not to make them slaves. Because of that, the people were very happy because of him. So this makes, option B, the correct answer because Abbas did not try to get the Armenians out of the kingdom. I hope this helps :)
Answer:
Eric Hobsbawm, the Marxist British historian, wrote a book called The Short Twentieth Century. The 20th Century had been shorter than other centuries because it had begun in 1914 with the outbreak of the First World War and terminated of course early in November 1989 with the fall of the Berlin Wall. The problem however, and of course we historians we like problems, is that everybody knew what we had left behind with the fall of the wall, but nobody knew what we were heading towards. As Douglas Hurd, the British Foreign Secretary at the time, put it, “this was a system [the Cold War], this was a system under which we had lived quite happily for 40 years.” Or as Adam Michnik, again my Polish solidarity intellectual, put it “The worst thing about communism is what comes afterwards.” While our populations were in jubilation in front of the television screens or on the streets of Berlin, governments were, it has to be said, seriously worried about the implications of this unforeseen, uncontrolled and uncontrollable collapse of the Warsaw Pact and the communist system. Tom Wolf, the American author, at the time had a bestseller called the Bonfire of the Vanities and a British MP that I knew at the time famously rephrased that as the ‘bonfire of the certainties.’ All of the reference points with which we’d lived for half a century and which had organized our diplomacy, our military strategy, our ideology, were like as many props that were suddenly pulled from us.
Answer:
Explanation:
In entering into civil society, people sacrifice the physical freedom of being able to do whatever they please, but they gain the civil freedom of being able to think and act rationally and morally. Rousseau believes that only by entering into the social contract can we become fully human.
Answer:
Because fort Sumter allowed the confederates to create a valuable hole in the union
Explanation:
