Answer:
The decision was risky
Explanation:
The decision was risky because the U.S didn't know what laid on those borders towards the west coast and had to have that whole area explored and mapped, they bought it without knowing what the area was like.
So the president could have bought useless land and they wouldnt have known it, luckily it wasnt lol
Answer:
the Open Door Policy. The aim was to give all nations equal trading rights in China. ... They soon quelled the rebellion, and a year later, in September 1901, China signed a humbling settlement agreement.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Can legislative compromises solve moral issues?
It is an interesting question that cannot be answered with a simple "yes" or "no." That is the nature of moral and ethical issues.
Legislative compromises serve to dictate laws that must be enforced. But you cannot enforce a moral issue. That is why it is moral.
Legislators must serve the citizens who voted for them. Not to the interests of political action committees (PACs) or private interests of corporations. Legislators serve the American people, not to a lobbyist that negotiates on the personal agendas of the people who are rich.
That is the moral issue. The way a legislator is going to act when facing the pressure of particular political agendas that are the opposite of the interests of the US citizens.
Answer: B not 100% sure :)
Explanation: one persons actions/freedom cannot hurt another persons life
the prisoners will start to behave and become more useful to the community
