No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
<h3>What is the declaration of independence?</h3>
This is the article that talked about the reason why the colonists wanted to be away from the leadership of the English people in the colonies. It talked about the issues that the people faced in the hands of Britain.
Freedom is supposed to be the universal right of all the people of the world but there are times that situations may exists that may cause some people to act like they are superior than other people.
For instance was during the colonial days, and the days that there was slavery in the United States.
The conclusion is that No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
Read more on the declaration of independence here:
brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ1
Answer:
C running the businesses and homes
Explanation:
it's just like for WW2 the women took over what the men did when they were fighting
Answer:
Donald trump and hillary if correct pleas mark brainlist
Explanation:
In 1893, a group of American businessmen and sugar barons, backed by the American military, overthrew the Hawaiian Kingdom by forcing Queen Liliuokalani to relinquish control of it.
Not sure if it’s thar answer you’re looking for but I hope it helps.
Popular sovereignty
In which the people choose who will represent them in the government.
Hope this helps :)