Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
Answer: D. Many times, when companies violated the law, it was intentional.
Explanation:
Edwin Sutherland was one of the most famous and influential criminologists to ever live. He gave several theories as to why people commit crime such as having grown up around crime and seeing it as normal.
His research into White Collar crime gave him eternal status as he broached a subject that many had avoided because the world then refused to accept that the higher economic classes could commit crime yet his research showed that many times, companies and their bigwigs violated the law intentionally.
Answer:
vkgxoyucuci can be hoyzgizgiigohoflj Dorian heuoxgoxyocupdpuhkxhkoto
Answer:
no? what is it about never head of it
Answer:
there is no advantage
Explanation:
other then the fact that they were there when the crime was commited
