Answer:
The Economic Stabilization Fund is also known as the rainy day fund.
Explanation:
This is a fund that the state of Texas (and many other U.S. states) can access in times of economic distress, in order to fund state spending.
The reason for this is that Texas, by it's constitution, must run a balanced budget, meaning that it cannot take on debt in case of deficit. This is why, in times when revenues do not match expenditures, the rainy day fund can be used as an option of last resort.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Modified rebuy.
Explanation:
A modified rebuy is a purchase usually made within a supply chain where a supplier has bought some goods initially but for the next purchase, the supplier requests changes in the purchase -<em>whereas price, product specifications or terms</em>- to better match the supplier's demands.
Many tax professionals and advisors recommend adjusting your W4 allowance so that THE TAX PAYMENT WILL EXACTLY MATCH ONE'S TAX LIABILITY.
Over payment and under payment of tax liability usually occur to people as a result of the number of withholding which they claim. Experts suggest adjusting the number of one' s withholding in order t avoid over or underpayment of tax.
Full question:
In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty
A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.
B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets
Answer and Explanation:
A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law
B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.
In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws
In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws
The answer is Congress :)