1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Drupady [299]
2 years ago
7

With employer-paid training, workers have the potential to become more productive not only in their present employment but also

in any number of jobs with different employers. To increase the productivity of their workforce, many firms are planning to maintain or even increase their investments in worker training. But some training experts object that if a trained worker is hired away by another firm, the employer that paid for the training has merely subsidized a competitor. They note that such hiring has been on the rise in recent years.
Which of the following would, if true, contribute most to defeating the training experts’ objection to the firms’ strategy?

A. Firms that promise opportunities for advancement to their employees get, on average, somewhat larger numbers of job applications from untrained workers than do firms that make no such promise.
B. In many industries, employees who take continuing-education courses are more competitive in the job market.
C. More and more educational and training institutions are offering reduced tuition fees to firms that subsidize worker training.
D. Research shows that workers whose training is wholly or partially subsidized by their employer tend to get at least as much training as do workers who pay for all their own training.
E. For most firms that invest in training their employees, the value added by that investment in employees who stay exceeds the value lost through other employees’ leaving to work for other companies
Business
1 answer:
alexdok [17]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is (E) For most firms that invest in training their employees, the value added by that investment in employees who stay exceeds the value lost through other employees’ leaving to work for other companies.  

Explanation:

This question is a dilemma for companies: Should they invest on training and development for people who might not stay in the company for long periods of time? In the end, even if the employees don’t stay long in the company, the value they bring to the company after being trained are usually more significant than if the employee wasn’t trained in the first place. After all, the risk for mismanagement is higher if the latter was implemented – and will result in higher loss for the company since the bad performance of unskilled employees might impact the company not only financially, but also reputation-wise.  

You might be interested in
Which describes the process by which assets or equipment decrease in value
JulsSmile [24]
Depreciation is the correct answer
4 0
2 years ago
Marsha’s Pet Store employs six employees. Their duties are to sell pets, replenish the stock, keep the pets’ cages clean, feed t
Gemiola [76]

Answer: True.

Explanation:

People sometimes have a tendency of doing only what they are told to do or only what they are paid for. This is why most people who progress in a company do so on the basis of having done work that was not in their description, but would have helped the company progress.

It would appear that Marsha's 6 employees are all of the caliber of employees who just do what they are told and nothing more.

For this reason therefore, she would include a stipulation changing the scheme to include careful performance of the other duties before any sales commission can be earned. This way they'll start to do those other things since they are now paid to do so.

8 0
3 years ago
Though the profits accrue to the local capitalists, a system of nationally controlled production still depends on __________.
Alex787 [66]
Foreign markets. because the cycle still depends on it
3 0
2 years ago
A firm has a profit margin of 5.1 percent, a total asset turnover of 1.84, and a return on equity of 16.2 percent. What is the d
Jet001 [13]

Answer:

Debt / Equity = 0.72649 : 1 or 72.649%

Explanation:

The ROE or return on equity can be calculated using the Du Pont equation. It breaks the ROE into three components. The formula for ROE under Du Pont is,

ROE = Net Income / Sales * Sales / Total Assets * Total Assets / Shareholder's equity

or

ROE = Net Income / Total equity

Assuming that sales is $100.

Net Income = 100 * 0.051 = 5.1

Total Assets = 100 / 1.84

Total Assets = 54.35

0.162 = 5.1 / Total equity

Total Equity = 5.1 / 0.162

Total Equity = 31.48

We know that Assets = Debt + Equity

So,

54.35 = Debt + 31.48

Debt = 54.35 - 31.48

Debt = 22.87

Debt / Equity = 22.87 / 31.48

Debt / Equity = 0.72649 : 1 or 72.649%

6 0
3 years ago
When the price of good A is $50, the quantity demanded of good A is 500 units. When the price of good A rises to $70, the quanti
katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

total revenue  for 500 is $2500

total revenue  for 400 is $2800

Explanation:

given data

price of good A = $50

quantity demanded of good A = 500 units

price of good A rises = $70

quantity demanded of good A falls = 400 units

solution

we get here Elasticity of demand that is express as

Elasticity of demand = (change in quantity ÷ average quantity) ÷ (change in price ÷ average price)   .......................1

here

Change in quantity is = 400 - 500 = -100  

and average quantity is =  \frac{400+500}{2} = 450

and change in price is = 70 - 50 = 20

average price is = \frac{70+50}{2} = 60

so now we put all value in equation 1

Elasticity of demand  = \frac{\frac{-100}{450} }{\frac{20}{60} }

Elasticity of demand  = -0.67

as here the elasticity of demand is inelastic because elasticity is above -1

so about total revenue when price will increases as elasticity is inelastic

so increase in price will cause increase in revenue because revenue is maximum when elasticity = -1

and increase in price will cause increases elasticity in the absolute term and revenue will increase

total revenue = price × quantity

so

total revenue  for 500 = 500 × 5 = $2500

total revenue  for 400 = 400 × 7 = $2800

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these states one of the opportunity costs of attending college?
    13·1 answer
  • Market researchers often compute the “mean” or average of data collected. Wha is the mean income of the following three people s
    10·1 answer
  • What is the term for a division of stock that gives stockholders a greater number of shares but does not change each individual'
    11·1 answer
  • Garnett Co. expects to purchase $180,000 of materials in July and $210,000 of materials in August. Three-fourths of all purchase
    10·1 answer
  • You and your neighbor Diane have agreed to be partners in CreatePlace Site Design, a website design business for small businesse
    10·1 answer
  • Consider a mutual fund with $300 million in assets at the start of the year and 10 million shares outstanding. The fund invests
    7·1 answer
  • Clem Oatley could grow wheat and barley. He could grow 75 bushels of wheat or 125 bushels of barley using the same resources on
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is used to describe government policies that restrain trade between states?
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the economic cycle. Give specific details and examples
    7·1 answer
  • Members of Generation Z are most likely to influence? Furniture design. B) health and insurance. C) retirement plans. D) e-textb
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!