<u><em>The price of one nation's currency in terms of another nation's currency is called the exchange rate</em></u>
Answer:
The most effective responses will be those aimed at restoring harmony between supervisors, allowing all sectors to work efficiently. The least effective responses will be those that seek to help only one supervisor or just one, or some sectors, to the detriment of the others.
Explanation:
As we can see, Jamie is in a situation where his management is very important. This is because the sector of the 9 supervisors on the front line of a given service, are in conflict with each other, which ends up harming the company's success, since it is necessary that all sectors work together.
The meeting established by Jamie, has the responsibility to evaluate the arguments of the supervisors and choose those that will bring an effective result within the company. Jamie must choose as efficient the arguments that show cooperative forms among supervisors, which promote the good functioning of all sectors. However, he must consider as non-efficient, all those arguments that provide separatist ideas and that promote the growth of only some sectors to the detriment of others.
Her bias is known as "the outgroup homogeneity effect".
Outgroup homogeneity is the inclination for individuals to see ingroup individuals as more differing than outgroup individuals. The Outgroup Homogeneity Effect is the propensity to see an outgroup as homogenous, or as "all the same," while the ingroup is viewed as more heterogeneous or differed.
Answer:
C) form utility
Explanation:
The term form utility simply refers to the value consumers places on finished goods. Here a company gives their product a type of form in order to increase its value and make it more accepted and more useful to consumers in this form.
When a Wine company insists on importing their wine in refrigerated containers in order to protect the wine, they are creating a form utility.
1.- These 3 arrangements differ from each other, since the Amalgamation, is the mixture of different things, they may be cultures or races, the Assimilation is the process of adaptation of the immigrant to the receiving society. This acquires the culture and customs of the adoption community, disappearing their status as "different". To the extent that the immigrant adopts the culture of receiving society, this will admit you as one more member, producing its full integration. This theory has been strongly criticized, from the ethical point of view, but also by believing that the immigrant will adapt to the new culture, independently of its origin, race or religion. And Pluralism refers to the dominant trend is that neither natives nor immigrants want to lose their identity, and adaptation would occur through the adherence of all, to common principles of coexistence , being able to maintain at certain levels the cultural characteristics of each group and as long as the conflicts that may arise do not affect these basic principles of coexistence, which are those that confer a sense of community and avoid social fragmentation. The most common stereotypes are: Americans, Latins, African Americans, Chinese, they will be more or less frequent depending on the city where you live, Latins are a common stereotype in the northern United States, and I do not think they are harmful to any group, The harmfulness of something or someone does not come from their race, or stereotyping.2.- In my country we experience the 3 arrangements, amalgamation, assimilation and pluralism, nowadays, thanks to globalization, we experience all 3 in many countries of the world, in almost all countries there is a mixture of races and customs derived from foreign citizens, in many of them foreigners adapt so much to the culture that they are inserted very quickly assimilating it as their own, and in many others the different cultures struggle to maintain their origin and customs, giving way to pluralization.
