Answer:
This best illustrates source amnesia.
Explanation:
Source amnesia is a memory disorder that causes a person to remember a factual knowledge but also to distort contextual elements. The person has difficulty recalling where, when, or how they obtained such knowledge. This is related to a malfunctioning of explicit memory. In Mr. Adams's case, the distortion seems to be related as to how he obtained that knowledge. He can remember the monument, but not that he saw it through pictures. He thinks visiting the monument is how he formed that memory.
Answer:
The automatic nervous system
Explanation:
The automatic nervous system is the part of the brain which plays a great role in the function of the brain. This system regulates the internal organs of the nervous system unconsciously. The autonomic nervous system has two main parts
- The sympathetic nervous system
- The parasympathetic nervous system
This system gets the information from the environment and sends the information to the brain.
- Functions
- Blood pressure
- Heart rates
- Breathing system
- Urination
-
Answer:
It is important to preserve our cultural heritage, because it keeps our integrity as a people. The importance of intangible cultural heritage is not the cultural manifestation itself but rather the wealth of knowledge and skills that is transmitted through it from one generation to the next.
Explanation:
Please Mark me brainliest
Answer: Social markers of difference.
Explanation: The social markers of diffence are a field study of social cience, with the goal of explain how the inequalities and hierarchies of all people are developed by the human history. The groups of people who are discriminated or disadvantage by the course of time are the focus in this social area.
Social markers of difference, beyond a study, is a form to help discriminated or disadvantage people know your own story and, even more, recognize yourselves as a important piece of the society puzzle, and to claim your rights in the right and effective ways.
Studies such as these make it possible to see more directly how worked theories are extended to society in the form of fostering public policies.
Many of the recent reflections on the production of difference and analysis of social inequality have been putting forth the articulation between the so called "social markers of difference". In this broad field - that involves debates on differential rights, acknowledgement policies, the production of new sensibilities, and at the same time the reformulation of past forms of exclusion - the intersection between race, nation, sexuality and gender is high lightened.
