7 cannot be the solution of compound inequality -3 < x < 6
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to find if 7 a solutions to the compound inequality -3 < x < 6
The compound inequality -3 < x < 6 states that the value of x can be greater than -3 but less than 6
Since 7 is greater than 6 so, 7 can't be the solution of compound inequality.
So, 7 cannot be the solution of compound inequality -3 < x < 6
Learn more about compound inequality at:
brainly.com/question/1465430
brainly.com/question/1858613
brainly.com/question/6703816
Keywords: compound inequality
#learnwithBrainly
8÷2/7
8/1÷2/7
8/1*7/2
56/2
28
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
y = x/2 +4
Step-by-step explanation:
new slope = -1/-2 = 1/2
x1 = -4, y1= 2
y-y1 = m(x-x1)
y - 2 = 1/2 {x- (-4)}
y-2 = 1/2 (x+4)
y-2 = x/2 + 2
y = x/2 +2+2
y = x/2 +4
Answer:
1.59C + 2.25A = 786.75
C + A = 33 (even if all were the higher paying adults, that would only be 33x2.25=74.25 far less than <<786.75)
1.59C + 1.59A = 33(1.59) = 52.47 subtract to eliminate C
(2.25-1.59)A = 786.75 -52.47 = 734.28
.66A = 734.28
A = 73428/66 = 1112.55 = about 1113 adults
C = 33-1113 = -1080 children
which makes no sense. over a thousand "negative" children? the public pool gave refunds to over a thousand prepaid children who didn't show up? but a public swimming pool, no matter how large, probably wouldn't accomodate 1113 adults.
Step-by-step explanation:
