After meiosis you are left with 23
If a claim is based on science, it will have a lot of scientific experimentation, replication of results, peer view, and proofs obtained from a lot of researches that substantiate investigated theory. However, if a claim is based on pseudoscience, instead of evidence that supports a theory, there would be claims that doesn’t follow specific criteria.
this is what i got from google
If the mountain was in the Front Ranges of the Rockies, I would look for a thrust fault underlying the mountain since thrusting is a low angle fault which juxtaposes older rocks on top of younger and thickens up the stratigraphic sequence. Also, mountains can form from normal faults whereby the hangingwall of the fault or the side of the fault which is towards the inclination of the fault drops down relative to the footwall (the side under the fault) so I would also look for a normal fault bounding a cliff face of the mountain.,
B. .25 x 4 equals one. Which is that one day we add.