Answer:
guilt, shame
Explanation:
Guilt: In psychology, the term "guilt" is determined as a phenomenon through which an individual feels remorse or responsible related to a certain crime, offense, etc irrespective of the fact that whether it is imagined or real. Guilt is often related to "others".
Shame: In psychology, the term "shame" is described as the phenomenon in which an individual feels pain that generally arises from his or her consciousness related to something which is considered as ridiculous, dishonorable, and improper, etc and usually implemented by others or oneself.
In the question above, the given statement signifies guilt & shame.
Answer:
Defamation and criticism made by his fans on the media networks are the human rights that were violated by the media platforms on Itumeleng Khune.
Explanation:
Itumeleng Khune (born 20 June 1987) is a South African goalkeeper for Kaizer Chiefs in the Premier Soccer League, and also the South African national team.
During the Nedbank Cup, his fans lashed and criticized him because of the Amakhosi's loss to SuperSport United in the Nedbank Cup. His fans took to the media to criticize him.
He humbly asked God to bless the 'bitter' fans, saying their insults did not define him.
Answer:
Landscape
Explanation:
Daoism is a religious tradition within Chinese and Japanese culture which specifically emphasizes living in harmony with your surroundings. According to my research on Daoism, I can say that based on the information provided within the question it is Landscape Paintings which draw inspiration from the beliefs of Daoism.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
If your parents come from different cultures you might be caught in a culture clash, for example if your mom is chinese and your dad is an ashkenazi jew, you will face a clash of chinese and Jewish culture and traditions
The cartoon from the 1900 publication was titled <em>"Divorce the Lesser Evil."</em>
- This was the argument of the Justice while the Church representative pleaded with the Justice to stop the fire being ignited against marriages with the immorality of divorce.
- This cartoon depicted the start of government interference or intervention in marriages by granting couples the legal right to divorce in the courts of law.
- From the artist's depiction, we can infer that marriage was being regarded as an unnecessary contract that could be terminated at will during government-sponsored and sanctioned divorce. From that period, Marriage started losing its covenant-for-life characteristics.
- At that progressive era, it was regarded as a better option to allow unhappy couples to go their separate ways and even remarry. There was no thought spared for the children of such unhappy marriages and divorces.
Thus, today, after more than 100 years, the results have been revised. Nations where divorce is allowed have multiplied in immorality. Families have been scattered. Children are adversely affected. And the world is not a better society.
Learn more about divorce at brainly.com/question/11286701
