The 2018 AP Test is taken from May 7 - 11
May is a spring month, so I'd say option B, spring.
Answer:
Congressional districts must have roughly equal populations if this is feasible.
In an opinion authored by Hugo L. Black, the 6-3 majority held that the district court had jurisdiction because debasement of the right to vote as a result of a state congressional apportionment law was justiciable and not subject to dismissal for "want of equity." The Court further held that the apportionment statute was invalid because it abridged the requirement of Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution that The House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen every second year by the people of the several states, and the electors in each state shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature.
Justice Clark concurred in part and dissented in part. He agreed with the majority that the trial court erred in dismissing the case for nonjusticiability and want of equity, but stated further that Article 1, section 2, does not forbid disproportionate congressional districts and that the case should be remanded for a hearing to determine whether the apportionment statute violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Justice Harlan dissented on the ground that the Constitution expressly provides that state legislatures and Congress have exclusive jurisdiction over problems of congressional apportionment of the type involved in the case.
Justice Stewart stated that he joined with Mr. Justice Harlan's dissent except insofar as there might be implied in that dissent the view that the issues were not justiciable.
Explanation:
Answer:
General Edward Braddock was popular British General who was also the commander-in-chief of the North American colonies. He was giving complete command was an expedition to fight off French and Indian forces.
This culminated into the French-Indian War where he lost not only a lot of his own troops but eventually his own life.
Accounts of his life and why he lost were clearly explained by both George Washington and Benjamin Franklin who both knew him.
<u> and greatly underestimated both the Indians and the French.</u>
This meant that Braddock had fewer resources than required and was simply ill-prepared for a conflict.
John Wycliffe translated the bible into English because he believed that the bible held authority over the church, and not vice versa. In the other hand, Calvin followed up on Wyciffe's work while also introducing an element of humanism which caught on with the public and was fuel to the fire of reformation. In addtiion, <span>Erasmus also worked on translating the bible and criticized the church.</span>
Answer:
State criminal proceedings
Explanation:
Mapp v. Ohio (1961), was a landmark case in criminal procedure, in which the United States Supreme Court decided that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against "unreasonable searches and seizures," may not be used in state law criminal prosecutions in state courts, as well, as had previously been the law, as in federal criminal law prosecutions in federal courts. The Supreme Court accomplished this by use of a principle known as selective incorporation.
