Answer: I agree with Dr. Walker and his colleagues that the changes to Jordan Jones’s meal could not explain his improved performance.
Explanation: I agree with Dr. Walker and his colleagues that the changes to Jordan Jones’s meal could not explain his improved performance because, food can´t change anything except for your hungriness, and the more food you eat the more fat you get, and not slim.
The type of microscope which would be the best tool to use to view the surface of a bacterial cell is a Scanning electron microscope.
This is because it can be used to look at the surface of objects at high resolution. Maximum magnification: Approximately 500,000x. Best for: Looking at surfaces of objects
<h3>What is a Microscope?</h3>
This refers to an optical instrument that is used for viewing very small objects and can be magnified several hundred times.
The type of microscope which would be the best tool to use to view the surface of a bacterial cell is a Scanning electron microscope.
This is because it can be used to look at the surface of objects at high resolution. Maximum magnification: Approximately 500,000x. Best for: Looking at surfaces of objects
Hence, we can see that your question is incomplete, so a general overview was given to you, and only the last question was answered.
Read more about microscopes here:
brainly.com/question/543989
#SPJ1
The difficulty with this answer, lies in the fact that not all of land and ocean biomes have been completely explored. The ocean is vast, covering approximately 70% of the Earth's surface, with literally vertical miles or kilometers of depth, and with some areas with sparse to no biodiversity. The same can be said about certain areas of large deserts with very low levels of biodversity, void of life, like vast deserts of the Sahara or Gobi. But, the Amazon rain forest contains still unknown species of plant and animal life, just like the ocean. Because of its vastness, intellectually, I would say the ocean contains more biodiversity, but the answer is scientifically, as of now, yet to be proven one way or the other.
