Matter of England<span>, </span>romances of English heroes<span> and </span>romances derived from English legend<span> are terms that 20th century scholars have given to a loose corpus of </span>Medieval literature 1 and 2<span> that in general deals with the locations characters and themes concerning </span>England<span>, </span>English history <span>or </span>English cultural mores<span> and shows some continuity between the poetry and myths of the </span>pre-Norman<span> or </span>Anglo-Saxon<span> era of </span>English history<span> as well as themes motifs and plots deriving from </span>English folklore<span>.
i hope i could help :)</span>
Answer:
I don't think so
Explanation:
I believe that shouldn't be a thing because if you think about for an example if you american you have freedom if your hispanic you can not.Now if you think about the logic we have a lot of different bloods so it would not be fair there would be so many non free people because of ancestors.hope this makes sense lol
Answer:
B. Two contradictory things simultaneously
Explanation:
In "1984" people in the society would be subconsciously aware of a fact, but would bury this reality with a contradictory thought. They would still be aware deep down, but not on the surface, which allowed them to follow and believe in their leader ignorantly.
My view. When a country depends on another, it cannot have an independent course of action. Though Taiwan is not a country (according to the UN and most countries), Over 60% of her GDP depends on trade with China. It is moot at this point, whether she wants independence or not, she is already a part of China by anyone’s pragmatic definition. South Korea is also stuck. Maybe not as much, but stuck. South Korea’s major trading partner is China and her security partner is the US. As the US and China get more and more distant from one another, South Korea has to tread water very carefully, not wanting to aggravate either side. Unfortunately, what is evolving is like the ‘cold war’. The US and US allies pitted against Russia/China allies. Most countries are caught in the middle. Their economic fate might be decided by which side they choose. Most want to be neutral but independent in action.
It's either c or d because a and b are opinionated
