The principle of stare decisis, which involves precedent, obliges other courts to apply the law consistently in the same circumstances.
When a case involves the same or similar facts or the same legal issues, a judicial decision known as a precedent is used as a guide. At common law, courts must follow the precedents of other courts. Courts must follow certain precedents but not others.
Determining which decisions apply to a particular court can be difficult due to the complexity of the federal structure. Priority is usually based on several decisions. Sometimes a single decision can set a precedent. For example, a state supreme court's interpretation of an individual statute is usually considered part of the law at the outset.
Learn about precedents:
brainly.com/question/6196271
#SPJ4
Answer: Good Grades, Making more Money, Having a nice car, A Nice house, Having a nice family
Taxes: Because they remove like %3 of your sallery and all your payments you have to pay a little bit more or a lot more.
Explanation:
Taxes Suck
The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects persons and their property from unreasonable searches by the government. In the Kyllo's case, the police obtained evidence of a marijuana growing operation inside Kyllo’s home, by using a thermal imaging device from outside the home. The police used the device to gather evidence to support issuance of a search warrant for the home.
In this case, I as the detective will use thermal imaging to get some details about the stolen items from outside Jasper's house. The evidence provided by this thermal imaging will provide me enough evidence to obtain a search warrant into Jasper's house. Based on the fourth amendment of the constitution, the detective cannot get a search warrant into the defendant's home unless they have provided a convincing evidence that an illegal item is contained in the defendant's house.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
It can be hard to steer with wind blowing on the sides of the car.
