1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SSSSS [86.1K]
3 years ago
13

Help me answer thank u I will mark brainliest

Law
2 answers:
vampirchik [111]3 years ago
8 0
The answer is true………..
Lesechka [4]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: (give brainliest)

False

True

False

You might be interested in
5. The
Firdavs [7]

Answer:

d. London Metropolitan Police

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The legislation that attempted to overturn the Helling precedent has been on the books since 1974 but has had little effect. Why
Margaret [11]

Answer:

Explanation:

Although it has been attempted to overturn the ruling in the Helling case, I would suppose that these attempts have been unsuccessful because the ruling was in favor of a higher standard of care than what was deemed appropriate by for the ophthalmologists. One might argue that the ruling has remained in place because holding the defendants liable was, in a way, a step towards checking the medical profession’s privilege to set it’s own standards. I feel as though legislature has probably not seen fit to reinforce it because the original ruling remains valid in that a doctor can follow all of the standards of care, and still be liable.

6 0
3 years ago
Please!!
Phantasy [73]
Edmond Locard is the answer
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When the Chicago Police Department raised the minimum age for an applicant from 21 to 25, they did so because _____.
Klio2033 [76]
They wanted a more mature police force
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • As a Police Chief and a servant of God, you need to help restore order to your community. What do you need to discuss with these
    7·1 answer
  • in my government class i have a question that asks what general limitation is placed on individual rights
    13·1 answer
  • What is the difference between temporary insanity and Insanity when used in a criminal trial?
    14·1 answer
  • Read the example in the reference image. This is an example of the government doing what?
    8·1 answer
  • Alternative dispute resolution is _____. (Select all that apply.)
    12·2 answers
  • This is due tmrw and I'm lsot
    5·1 answer
  • Who is responsible for serving jury duty?
    10·1 answer
  • Pick a case where police used deadly force and present the facts to the class. You may want to review the Continuum of Force Pyr
    6·1 answer
  • A strong hunch is a good enough reason for a police officer to ask for a search or arrest warrant from a judge or magistrate. Tr
    7·1 answer
  • What does Claudius say in his soliloquy?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!