When a country uses changes to taxes and spending to influence the macroeconomy, it is called fiscal policy.
The use of government spending and tax policies to influence economic conditions, particularly macroeconomic conditions, is referred to as fiscal policy. These include total goods and services demand, employment, inflation, and economic growth.
During a recession, the government may reduce tax rates or increase spending in order to stimulate demand and economic activity. To combat inflation, it may raise interest rates or cut spending to cool the economy.
Fiscal policy is frequently contrasted with monetary policy, which is implemented by central bankers rather than elected officials.
To know more about fiscal policy, click here:
brainly.com/question/27250647
#SPJ4
Answer:
He will recover $70 because he was 30% responsible according to the court.
Explanation:
The Civil Procedure and Remedies Code on its section 33.001 states about proportionate responsibility. And it clearly states that in damages actions the claimant may not recover if it's more than 50% responsible. In the case given Macho is 30% responsible so he would recover 70% of the damages claimed that is the responsibility of the other part. Both parts have a certain degree of responsibility in the claim at the eyes of the court so, they compensate Macho´s claim of $100 according to the percentage the court gave to each one.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
D, because if the faulty product is hazardous and can cause problems for the comsumer/customer; then it makes sense to file a lawsuit.
For example if the product has fake advertisment, or mis-leasding lables or a high level of harmful material.
(But you can be a Karen and post a review, that works too)
There are other options in the case when defendant admits to the crime (of killing the victim)
Explanation:
In case the defendant accepts to have committed the crime of killing the victim, he can be given a thought of receiving some leniency in the punishment.
The counsel of the concerned defendant can argue in the court of law, that act was in a fit of rage, or haste of anger and was entirely not pre-meditated. He can further arague that feeling guilt of the crime, the defendant admitted to his crime hence he should be subjected to a lenient term.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
this will help the criminals to be alert of officers
