Answer:
Imagine you have just flicked a lighter. If you don’t see the flame, you will naturally try a second time. If after the second attempt it does not strike a flame, you will repeat your action again and again until it does. Eventually, you’ll see the flame and you’ll know that your lighter works. But what if it doesn’t? How long are you going to flick the lighter until you decide to give up?
Our everyday life is full of such decision dilemmas and uncertainty. We constantly have to choose between options, whether we make the most ordinary decisions – should I continue flicking this lighter? – or life-changing choices – should I leave this relationship? We can either keep on doing what we are already used to do, or risk unexplored options that could turn out much more valuable.
Some people are naturally inclined to take more chances, while others prefer to hold on to what they know best. Yet being curious and explorative is fundamental for humans and animals to find out how best to harvest resources such as water, food or money. While looking at the Belém Tower – a symbol of Portugal’s great maritime discoveries – from my office window, I often wonder what drives people to explore the unknown and what goes on in their brains when weighing pros and cons for trying something new. To answer these questions, together with Dr. Zachary Mainen and his team of neuroscientists, we investigate how the brain deals with uncertainty when making decisions.
Explanation:
It is well known that the decision-making process results from communication between the prefrontal cortex (working memory) and hippocampus (long-term memory). However, there are other regions of the brain that play essential roles in making decisions, but their exact mechanisms of action still are unknown.
I think it’s C, please forgive me if I’m wrong
Answer:
d. Transactions exposure.
Explanation:
Transactions exposure -
It is the level of uncertainty involved in a business in the international trade face .
It is the risk which currency exchange rates would fluctuate after the firm has taken a financial obligation .
The high level of vulnerability to shift the exchange rates can lead to the loss of the major capital for the international business .
Hence from the information of the question , the correct answer is d. Transactions exposure .
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
For year 1
According to the Company's Books Depreciation
= (Orginal Cost - Salvage value) ÷ useful Life
= ($50,000 - $5,000) ÷ 10 years
= $4,500
According to the Income Tax Depreciation
= Cost × MACRS Rate for Year 1
= $50,000 × 20%
= $10,000
So, the difference in year 1 is
= $10,000 - $4,500
= $5,500
For year 2
According to the Company's Books Depreciation
= (Orginal Cost - Salvage value) ÷ useful Life
= ($50,000 - $5,000) ÷ 10 years
= $4,500
According to the Income Tax Depreciation
= Cost × MACRS Rate for Year 2
= $50,000 × 32%
= $16,000
So, the difference in year 1 is
= $16,000 - $4,500
= $11,500
Answer: d. She will be easily distracted.
Explanation:
When one is said to be conscientious, it means that they are very dedicated to their duty. They value their duty and they want to do it well. A conscientious person is focused on their duty with the aim of fulfilling it to the best of their ability and so are reliable and trustworthy.
If a person is said to be low in conscientiousness, it means that they do not value their duty as well as they should and like Jane Simpson can get easily distracted from said duty.
