Answer:
The answer is Place
Explanation:
In the marketing mix, the process of moving products from the producer to the intended user is called place. In other words, it is how your product is bought and where it is bought. This movement could be through a combination of intermediaries such as distributors, wholesalers and retailers.
Answer:
3 cases
Explanation:
Marginal product refers to change in the total output when an additional input is employed. For example, output is 5 units when 2 laborers are employed. When another unit of input i.e 3rd laborer is employed, the output rises to 9 units. In this case marginal product of the 3rd unit of labor would be 9 - 5 i.e 4 units.
In the given case, before Atul is hired, the production was 4 cases per week. After his being hired, it rose to 7 cases per week. Thus Atul's marginal product in the given case would be 7 - 4 i.e 3 cases.
Answer:
Overhead cost allocated to steel bars = $4.6
6,600 = $30,360
Explanation:
Provided information,
Two products manufactured
Steel Bars and Titanium bars
Number of hours = 1 hour each
Total units produced
Steel = 6,600
Titanium = 3,400
Total hours @ 1 hour for each = 6,600 + 3,400 = 10,000
Total Setup cost = $46,000
Cost per hour based on direct labor hours = $46,000/10,000 = $4.6
Overhead cost allocated to steel bars = $4.6
6,600 = $30,360
Answer:
returning inventory that is defective or broken
Explanation:
Inventory reffered to as set of finished goods/ products as well as other goods that are used in production. It is regarded as current asset on the balance sheet of a company. Inventory safeguarding is very essential in a company to keep them safe, there are some ways in which this can be done.
With the aid of technology such as security cameras which can record any form of theft, door alarms and others can protect inventory from both external/internal threats. Some of thers common examples for safeguarding inventory are;
✓storing inventory in restricted areas
✓physical devices such as two-way mirrors, cameras, and alarms
✓matching receiving documents, purhcase orders, and vendor's invoice
McCulloch v. Maryland represented a power struggle between the State and Federal law. It was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The state of Maryland had attempted to impede operation of a branch of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on all notes of banks not chartered in Maryland. Though the law, by its language, was generally applicable to all banks not chartered in Maryland, the Second Bank of the United States was the only out-of-state bank then existing in Maryland, and the law was recognized in the court's opinion as having specifically targeted the U.S. Bank.